Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31527479›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Comparison between the Bouchama and Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Heatstroke Criteria with Regard to the Diagnosis and Prediction of Mortality of Heatstroke Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Yutaka Kondo, Toru Hifumi, Junya Shimazaki, Yasutaka Oda, Shin-Ichiro Shiraishi, Kei Hayashida, Tatsuma Fukuda, Masahiro Wakasugi, Jun Kanda, Takashi Moriya and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Yutaka KondoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba 279-0021, Japan. kondokondou2000@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-1072-7089
Toru HifumiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan. hifumitoru@gmail.com.
Junya ShimazakiDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. jshimazaki@nifty.com.
Yasutaka OdaAdvanced Medical Emergency and Critical Care Center, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan. yasutaka-ygc@umin.ac.jp.
Shin-Ichiro ShiraishiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Aidu Chuo Hospital, Fukushima 965-8611, Japan. shinshi@nms.ac.jp.
Kei HayashidaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. keilinda0714@gmail.com.
Tatsuma FukudaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan. tatsumafukuda-jpn@umin.ac.jp.
Masahiro WakasugiEmergency and Critical Care Center, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama 930-0152, Japan. mwaka@med.u-toyama.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4523-0067
Jun KandaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan. jkanda-cib@umin.ac.jp.
Takashi MoriyaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan. tmoriya@jichi.ac.jp.
Masaharu YagiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Urasoe General Hospital, Okinawa 901-2132, Japan. masaharuy0130@gmail.com.
Takashi KawaharaJapan Sport Council, Tokyo 107-0061, Japan. kawahara2630@gmail.com.
Michihiko TonouchiJapan Meteorological Business Support Center, Tokyo 101-0054, Japan. tono@jmbsc.or.jp.
Shoji YokoboriDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan. shoji@nms.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7409-704X
Hiroyuki YokotaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan. yokota@nms.ac.jp.
Yasufumi MiyakeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan. ymiyake-nsu@umin.ac.jp.
Keiki ShimizuEmergency and Critical Care Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Centre, Tokyo 183-8524, Japan. keishimizu-nsu@umin.ac.jp.
Nippon Medical School Hospital · JPTeikyo University · JPFukushima Medical University Hospital · JPJapan Meteorological Agency · JPJapan Sport Council · JPJichi Medical University · JPJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JPKeio University · JPOkinawa Prefectural Chubu Hospital · JPSt. Luke's International Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JPTokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center · JPToyama University Hospital · JPUniversity of the Ryukyus · JPYamaguchi University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to compare the Bouchama heatstroke (B-HS) and Japanese Association for Acute Medicine heatstroke (JAAM-HS) criteria with regard to the diagnosis and prediction of mortality and neurological status of heatstroke patients.

methodsThis multicenter observational study recruited eligible patients from the emergency departments of 110 major hospitals in Japan from 1 July to 30 September, 2014.

resultsA total of 317 patients (median age, 65 years; interquartile range, 39-80 years) were included and divided into the B-HS, JAAM-HS, and non-HS groups, with each group consisting of 97, 302, and 15 patients, respectively. The JAAM-HS (1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.0) and B-HS (0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.49) criteria showed high and low sensitivity to mortality, respectively. Similarly, the JAAM-HS (1.0; 95% CI, 0.93-1.0) and B-HS (0.35; 95% CI, 0.23-0.49) criteria showed high and low sensitivity to poor neurological status, respectively. Meanwhile, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores demonstrated good accuracy in predicting mortality among heat-related illness (HRI) patients. However, both JAAM-HS and B-HS criteria could not predict in-hospital mortality. The AUC of the SOFA score for mortality was 0.83 (day 3) among the HRI patients. The patients' neurological status was difficult to predict using the JAAM-HS and B-HS criteria. Concurrently, the total bilirubin level could relatively predict the central nervous system function at discharge.

conclusionsThe JAAM-HS criteria showed high sensitivity to mortality and could include all HRI patients who died. The JAAM-HS criterion was considered a useful tool for judgement of admission at ED. Further investigations are necessary to determine the accuracy of both B-HS and JAAM-HS criteria in predicting mortality and neurological status at discharge.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBilirubinEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHeat StrokeHospital MortalityHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexSocieties, MedicalYoung AdultBilirubindiagnosisemergencyheat related illnessheat stroke

Identifiers

PMID31527479
PMCPMC6765926
OpenAlexW2974837699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.