Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31527417›Full record

ReviewNutrients2019

Accounting for the Nutritional Context to Correctly Interpret Results from Studies of Exercise and Sedentary Behavior.

Barry Braun, Alissa Newman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barry BraunDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. barry.braun@colostate.edu.
Alissa NewmanDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a wealth of research lauding the benefits of exercise to oppose cardiometabolic disease such as diabetes, CVD and hypertension. However, in the great majority of these studies, the nutritional context (energy balance, deficit, or surplus) has been ignored, despite its profound effect on responses to both exercise and inactivity. Even a minor energy deficit or surplus can strongly modulate the magnitude and duration of the metabolic responses to an intervention; therefore, failure to account for this important confounding variable obscures clear interpretation of the results from studies of exercise or inactivity. The aim of this review is to highlight key lessons from studies examining the interaction between exercise and sedentary behavior, energy status, and glucose and insulin regulation. In addition to identifying notable problems, we suggest a few potential solutions.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeEnergy MetabolismExerciseHealthy LifestyleNutritional StatusRisk Reduction BehaviorSedentary BehaviorAnimalsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseHeart DiseasesHumansInsulinInsulin ResistanceMetabolic DiseasesProtective FactorsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseInsulinenergy balanceexercise scienceexperimental designglucose metabolisminactivityinsulin sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31527417
PMCPMC6769997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.