ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Selection of endurance capabilities and the trade-off between pressure and volume in the evolution of the human heart.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraspecific sequence variation and complete genomes refine the identification of rapidly evolved regions in humans.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Why Do Humans Exercise? A Neuro-Evolutionary Framework for Discretionary Physical Effort.Evolutionary anthropology · 2026Review
- Adaptive loss of function accelerated the evolution of ancient and modern human cognition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Dampened inflammation and reduced risk of osteoarthritis among non-industrialized societies.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2026Review
- Physical activity and cardiometabolic health across an extreme lifestyle gradient.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2026Article
- Cardiorespiratory fitness in relation to cardiometabolic health in adult Mexican Rarámuri.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2025Article
- High-Intensity Interval Training Improves Cardiovascular Fitness and Induces Left-Ventricular Hypertrophy During Off-Season.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Contemporary small-scale subsistence populations offer unique insights into human musculoskeletal health and aging.Science advances · 2024Review
- Evolution of translational control and the emergence of genes and open reading frames in human and non-human primate hearts.Nature cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Left ventricular trabeculation in Hominidae: divergence of the human cardiac phenotype.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Cerebrovascular adaptations to habitual resistance exercise with aging.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024Review
- Cell-type-specificeLife · 2024Article
- Applying an evolutionary mismatch framework to understand disease susceptibility.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Comparative physiological anthropogeny: exploring molecular underpinnings of distinctly human phenotypes.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- The aorta in humans and African great apes, and cardiac output and metabolic levels in human evolution.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Tropomyosin Isoform Diversity in the Cynomolgus Monkey Heart and Skeletal Muscles Compared to Human Tissues.Biochemistry research international · 2023Article
- Equal force generation potential of trabecular and compact wall ventricular cardiomyocytes.iScience · 2022Article
- Evolutionary Approaches in Aging Research.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2022Review
- Orang Asli Health and Lifeways Project (OA HeLP): a cross-sectional cohort study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Comparing high versus low-altitude populations to test human adaptations for increased ventilation during sustained aerobic activity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Chimpanzees and gorillas, when not inactive, engage primarily in short bursts of resistance physical activity (RPA), such as climbing and fighting, that creates pressure stress on the cardiovascular system. In contrast, to initially hunt and gather and later to farm, it is thought that preindustrial human survival was dependent on lifelong moderate-intensity endurance physical activity (EPA), which creates a cardiovascular volume stress. Although derived musculoskeletal and thermoregulatory adaptations for EPA in humans have been documented, it is unknown if selection acted similarly on the heart. To test this hypothesis, we compared left ventricular (LV) structure and function across semiwild sanctuary chimpanzees, gorillas, and a sample of humans exposed to markedly different physical activity patterns. We show the human LV possesses derived features that help augment cardiac output (CO) thereby enabling EPA. However, the human LV also demonstrates phenotypic plasticity and, hence, variability, across a wide range of habitual physical activity. We show that the human LV's propensity to remodel differentially in response to chronic pressure or volume stimuli associated with intense RPA and EPA as well as physical inactivity represents an evolutionary trade-off with potential implications for contemporary cardiovascular health. Specifically, the human LV trades off pressure adaptations for volume capabilities and converges on a chimpanzee-like phenotype in response to physical inactivity or sustained pressure loading. Consequently, the derived LV and lifelong low blood pressure (BP) appear to be partly sustained by regular moderate-intensity EPA whose decline in postindustrial societies likely contributes to the modern epidemic of hypertensive heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.