ArticleInfection and immunity2019
Bimodal Response to Shiga Toxin 2 Subtypes Results from Relatively Weak Binding to the Target Cell.
Article in Infection and immunity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diverse landscape of AB5-type toxins.Engineering microbiology · 2023Review
- Cellular Activity ofToxins · 2021Article
- Switching Shiga Toxin (Stx) Type from Stx2d to Stx2a but Not Stx2c Alters Virulence of Stx-ProducingToxins · 2021Article
- Core and Accessory Genome Comparison of Australian and International Strains of O157 Shiga Toxin-ProducingFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There are two major antigenic forms of Shiga toxin (Stx), Stx1 and Stx2, which bind the same receptor and act on the same target but nonetheless differ in potency. Stx1a is more toxic to cultured cells, but Stx2 subtypes are more potent in animal models. To understand this phenomenon in cultured cells, we used a system that combines flow cytometry with a fluorescent reporter to monitor the Stx-induced inhibition of protein synthesis in single cells. We observed that Vero cells intoxicated with Stx1a behave differently than those intoxicated with Stx2 subtypes: cells challenged with Stx1a exhibited a population-wide loss of protein synthesis, while cells exposed to Stx2a or Stx2c exhibited a dose-dependent bimodal response in which one subpopulation of cells was unaffected (i.e., no loss of protein synthesis). Cells challenged with a hybrid toxin containing the catalytic subunit of Stx1a and the cell-binding subunit of Stx2a also exhibited a bimodal response to intoxication, while cells challenged with a hybrid toxin containing the catalytic subunit of Stx2a and the cell-binding subunit of Stx1a exhibited a population-wide loss of protein synthesis. Other experiments further supported a primary role for the subtype of the B subunit in the outcome of host-Stx interactions. Our collective observations indicate that the bimodal response to Stx2 subtypes is due to relatively weak binding between Stx2 and the host cell that reduces the total functional pool of Stx2 in comparison to that of Stx1a. This explains, in part, the molecular basis for the differential cellular toxicity between Stx1a and Stx2 subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.