Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31527046›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Molecular Profiling of the

Pratyajit Mohapatra, Karen Menuz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Expression ofInsects · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. eLife · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Binding Properties of Odorant-Binding Protein 4 ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ir76b is a Co-receptor for Amine Responses inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Pratyajit MohapatraPhysiology & Neurobiology Department.
Karen MenuzPhysiology & Neurobiology Department, karen.menuz@uconn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8163-0941
Genomics (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute of Physiology and Basic Medicine · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repellent odors are widely used to prevent insect-borne diseases, making it imperative to identify the conserved molecular underpinnings of their olfactory systems. Currently, little is known about the molecules supporting odor signaling beyond the odor receptors themselves. Most known molecules function in one of two classes of olfactory sensilla, single-walled or double-walled, which have differing morphology and odor response profiles. Here, we took two approaches to discover novel genes that contribute to insect olfaction in the periphery. We transcriptionally profiled

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod AntennaeDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenes, InsectHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSmellTranscriptomeDrosophila ProteinsAntennaDrosophilaGene ExpressionInsectOlfaction

Identifiers

PMID31527046
PMCPMC6829134
OpenAlexW2974337396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.