Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31526759›Full record

ArticleCancer cell2019

Passenger Hotspot Mutations in Cancer.

Julian M Hess, Andre Bernards, Jaegil Kim, Mendy Miller, Amaro Taylor-Weiner, Nicholas J Haradhvala, Michael S Lawrence, Gad Getz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Topographical archetypes of somatic mutagenesis in cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. An interpretable molecular framework for predicting cancer driver missense mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cancer research and the mainstream of biology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Hotspot propensity across mutational processes.Molecular systems biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Reuniting philosophy and science to advance cancer research.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julian M HessThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Andre BernardsCenter for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 250 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jaegil KimThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Mendy MillerThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Amaro Taylor-WeinerThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Nicholas J HaradhvalaThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Michael S LawrenceThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 250 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: mslawrence@mgh.harvard.edu.
Gad GetzThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 250 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: gadgetz@broadinstitute.org.

Funding

The Cancer Genome Atlas Data Analysis CenterU24CA143845 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CHIN, LYNDA, GETZ, GAD A · 2009 to 2016
$16.0M
Training Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative GenomicsT32HG002295 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Peter J Park · 2001 to 2026
$15.8M
Global Infrastructure for Collaborative High-throughput Cancer Genomics AnalysisU24CA210999 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI GETZ, GAD A · 2016 to 2020
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143845NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210999NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current statistical models for assessing hotspot significance do not properly account for variation in site-specific mutability, thereby yielding many false-positives. We thus (i) detail a Log-normal-Poisson (LNP) background model that accounts for this variability in a manner consistent with models of mutagenesis; (ii) use it to show that passenger hotspots arise from all common mutational processes; and (iii) apply it to a ∼10,000-patient cohort to nominate driver hotspots with far fewer false-positives compared with conventional methods. Overall, we show that many cancer hotspot mutations recurring at the same genomic site across multiple tumors are actually passenger events, recurring at inherently mutable genomic sites under no positive selection.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticMutagenesisCarcinogenesisDatasets as TopicDNA Mutational AnalysisExome SequencingGenes, Tumor SuppressorGenomicsHumansNeoplasmsPoisson DistributionROC CurveSelection, GeneticcancerdriversgenomicshotspotsLog-normal-Poissonmutabilitymutationspassengersselection

Identifiers

PMID31526759
PMCPMC7371346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.