Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31526411›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2019

The weeks before 100 persecutory delusions: the presence of many potential contributory causal factors.

Daniel Freeman, Anthony Morrison, Jessica C Bird, Eleanor Chadwick, Emily Bold, Kathryn M Taylor, Rowan Diamond, Nicola Collett, Emma Černis, Louise Isham and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Spotlight commentary: REBUS and the anarchic brain.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daniel FreemanProfessor of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2541-2197
Anthony MorrisonProfessor of Clinical Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust; and Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Jessica C BirdResearch Clinical Psychologist, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-1506
Eleanor ChadwickResearch Assistant, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Emily BoldResearch Assistant, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Kathryn M TaylorResearch Assistant, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Rowan DiamondResearch Clinical Psychologist, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Nicola CollettDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Emma ČernisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Louise IshamResearch Clinical Psychologist, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1752-5236
Rachel ListerResearch Clinical Psychologist, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Miriam KirkhamResearch Assistant, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Ashley-Louise TealeResearch Assistant, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Eve TwivyResearch Assistant, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Felicity WaiteResearch Clinical Psychologist, University of Oxford; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2749-1386

Funding

Department of Health RP-2014-05-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe period before the formation of a persecutory delusion may provide causal insights. Patient accounts are invaluable in informing this understanding.

aimsTo inform the understanding of delusion formation, we asked patients about the occurrence of potential causal factors - identified from a cognitive model - before delusion onset.

methodA total of 100 patients with persecutory delusions completed a checklist about their subjective experiences in the weeks before belief onset. The checklist included items concerning worry, images, low self-esteem, poor sleep, mood dysregulation, dissociation, manic-type symptoms, aberrant salience, hallucinations, substance use and stressors. Time to reach certainty in the delusion was also assessed.

resultsMost commonly it took patients several months to reach delusion certainty (n = 30), although other patients took a few weeks (n = 24), years (n = 21), knew instantly (n = 17) or took a few days (n = 6). The most frequent experiences occurring before delusion onset were: low self-confidence (n = 84); excessive worry (n = 80); not feeling like normal self (n = 77); difficulties concentrating (n = 77); going over problems again and again (n = 75); being very negative about the self (n = 75); images of bad things happening (n = 75); and sleep problems (n = 75). The average number of experiences occurring was high (mean 23.5, s.d. = 8.7). The experiences clustered into six main types, with patients reporting an average of 5.4 (s.d. = 1.0) different types.

conclusionsPatients report numerous different experiences in the period before full persecutory delusion onset that could be contributory causal factors, consistent with a complex multifactorial view of delusion occurrence. This study, however, relied on retrospective self-report and could not determine causality. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

aberrant saliencedissociationself-esteemsleep problemsWorry

Identifiers

PMID31526411
PMCPMC6749142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.