Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31526391›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2019

Segmental aneuploidy in human blastocysts: a qualitative and quantitative overview.

María-José Escribà, Xavier Vendrell, Vanessa Peinado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Primary sex ratio in euploid embryos of consanguine couples after IVF/ICSI.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: The management of mosaic embryos.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The model of "genetic compartments": a new insight into reproductive genetics.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

María-José EscribàIVF Laboratory. IVIRMA-Valencia, 46015, Valencia, Spain. mariajose.escriba@ivirma.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1321-4978
Xavier VendrellReproductive Genetics Unit, Sistemas Genómicos, Parque Tecnológico Paterna, 46980, Valencia, Spain.
Vanessa PeinadoIgenomix, Parque Tecnológico Paterna, 46980, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

APOTIP/2019/A/010 APOTIP/2019/A/010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroarray-based and next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have revealed that segmental aneuploidy is frequently present in human oocytes, cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts. However, very little research has analyzed the type, size, chromosomal distribution and topography of the chromosomal segments at the different stages of development.

methodsThis is a retrospective study of 822 PGT-A (preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidies) performed on trophectoderm samples from 3565 blastocysts biopsied between January 2016 and April 2017. The cycles in question had been initiated for varying clinical indications. Samples were analyzed by next generation sequencing-based technology. Segmental aneuploidies were evaluated when fragment size was > 5 Mb. Blastocysts presenting a single segmental aneuploidy (SSA), without any additional whole-chromosome gain/loss, were statistically analyzed for incidence, type, size and chromosomal emplacement. Segment sizes relative to the whole chromosome or arm (chromosome- and arm-ratios) were also studied.

results8.4% (299/3565) of blastocysts exhibited segmental aneuploidy for one or more chromosomes, some of which were associated with whole-chromosome aneuploidy while others were not. Nearly half of them (4.5%: 159/3565 of blastocysts) exhibited pure-SSA, meaning that a single chromosome was affected by a SSA. Segments were more frequent in medium-sized metacentric or submetacentric chromosomes and particularly in q-chrmosome arms, variables that were related to trophectoderm quality. SSA size was related to a greater extent to chromosome number and the arm affected than it was to SSA type. In absolute values (Mb), SSA size was larger in large chromosomes. However, the SSA:chromosome ratio was constant across all chromosomes and never exceeded 50% of the chromosome.

conclusionsSSA frequency is chromosome- and topographically dependent, and its incidence is not related to clinical or embryological factors, but rather to trophectoderm quality. SSA might be originated by chromosome instability in response to chromothripsis, bias introduced by the biopsy and/or iatrogenic effects.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AneuploidyBlastocystChromosome MappingFemaleGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansOocytesPregnancyPreimplantation DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesChromosomal instabilityChromothripsisHuman blastocystPGT-ASegmental aneuploidy

Identifiers

PMID31526391
PMCPMC6745804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.