Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31526248›Full record

SynthesisMedical education online2019

Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leisi Pei, Hongbin Wu

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical education online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 272 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
272citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04466371 suspendednot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Perceptions of Undergraduate Students and Teaching Staff on Online Teaching and Learning in the Wake of COVID-19 Pandemic in an Egyptian Private University: A Cross-Sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMisr International UniversityRan2027 to 2027Enrolled9,209ConditionsCovid19ArmsQuestionnaire
NCT05520671 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating TESLA-G, a Gamified, Telegram-delivered, Quizzing Platform for Surgical Education in Medical Students: a Protocol for a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanyang Technological UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsSurgical Education in Medical StudentsArmsGamified online quizzing platform, Conventional quizzing platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

272 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Games as homework to promote student engagement in an asynchronous online course.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

212 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leisi PeiInstitute of Basic Education Science, Beijing Academy of Educational Sciences , Beijing , China.
Hongbin WuInstitute of Medical Education/National center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University , Beijing , China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing use of technology in education, online learning has become a common teaching method. How effective online learning is for undergraduate medical education remains unknown. This article's aim is to evaluate whether online learning when compared to offline learning can improve learning outcomes of undergraduate medical students. Five databases and four key journals of medical education were searched using 10 terms and their Boolean combinations during 2000-2017. The extracted articles on undergraduates' knowledge and skill outcomes were synthesized using a random effects model for the meta-analysis.16 out of 3,700 published articles were identified. The meta-analyses affirmed a statistically significant difference between online and offline learning for knowledge and skill outcomes based on post-test scores (SMD = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.43, 1.20; p < 0.0001; n = 15). The only comparison result based on retention test scores was also statistically significant (SMD = 4.64; 95% CI: 3.19, 6.09; p < 0.00001). The meta-analyses discovered no significant difference when using pre- and post-test score gains (SMD = 3.03; 95% CI: -0.13, 4.13; p = 0.07; n = 3). There is no evidence that offline learning works better. And compared to offline learning, online learning has advantages to enhance undergraduates' knowledge and skills, therefore, can be considered as a potential method in undergraduate medical teaching.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansInternetStudents, MedicalTeachingmeta-analysisoffline learningOnline learningsystematic reviewundergraduate medical education (UME)

Identifiers

PMID31526248
PMCPMC6758693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.