Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31526225›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women: a randomized, observer-blind trial.

Timo Vesikari, Miia Virta, Seppo Heinonen, Cécile Eymin, Nathalie Lavis, Anne Laure Chabanon, Viviane Gresset-Bourgeois

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Timo VesikariVaccine Research Center, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Miia VirtaTampere Vaccine Research Clinic, Vaccine Research Center, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Seppo HeinonenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Cécile EyminMedical Operations, Sanofi Pasteur, Campus Sanofi Lyon, Lyon, France.
Nathalie LavisMedical Operations, Sanofi Pasteur, Campus Sanofi Lyon, Lyon, France.
Anne Laure ChabanonGlobal Pharmacovigilance, Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France.
Viviane Gresset-BourgeoisGlobal Pharmacovigilance, Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France.
Sanofi (France) · FRTampere University · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination against influenza during pregnancy provides direct protection to pregnant women and indirect protection to their infants. Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV3s) are safe and effective during pregnancy, but quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV4s) have not been evaluated in pregnant women and their infants. Here, we report the results of a randomized phase IV study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of IIV4 vs. IIV3 in pregnant women. Participants aged ≥18 years at weeks 20 to 32 of gestation were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single dose of IIV4 (n = 230) or IIV3 (n = 116). Between baseline and 21 days after vaccination, hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers increased in both groups by similar magnitudes for the two influenza A strains and single B strain common to IIV4 and IIV3. For the additional B strain in IIV4, HAI titers were higher in IIV4 recipients than IIV3 recipients (post-/pre-vaccination geometric mean titer ratio, 6.3 [95% CI: 5.1 - 7.7] vs. 3.4 [95% CI: 2.7 - 4.3]). At delivery, in both groups, HAI antibody titers for all strains were 1.5 - 1.9-fold higher in umbilical cord blood than in maternal blood, confirming active transplacental antibody transfer. Rates of solicited and unsolicited vaccine-related adverse events in mothers were similar between the two groups. Live births were reported for all participants and there were no vaccine-related adverse events in newborns. These results suggest IIV4 is as safe and immunogenic as IIV3 in pregnant women, and that maternal immunization with IIV4 should protect newborns against influenza via passively acquired antibodies.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnant PeopleVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, InactivatedImmunizationinfluenza vaccinesnewborn infantpregnancysafetyseasonal influenzatransplacental antibody transfervaccination

Identifiers

PMID31526225
PMCPMC7227680
OpenAlexW2974499032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.