Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31525441›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2020

A regimen to minimize pain during blue light photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses: Bilaterally controlled, randomized trial of simultaneous versus conventional illumination.

Urvashi Kaw, Muneeb Ilyas, Taylor Bullock, Lisa Rittwage, Margo Riha, Allison Vidimos, Bo Hu, Christine B Warren, Edward V Maytin

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Urvashi KawDepartment of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Muneeb IlyasDepartment of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Taylor BullockDepartment of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lisa RittwageDepartment of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Margo RihaDepartment of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Allison VidimosDepartment of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Bo HuDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Christine B WarrenDepartment of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Edward V MaytinDepartment of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: maytine@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Small Molecule Enhancers of Photodynamic Therapy for Skin CancerP01CA084203 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Brian William Pogue · 2001 to 2026
$27.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA084203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlue light photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective for actinic keratosis, but many patients experience stinging pain during illumination.

objectiveTo compare a conventional regimen (1 hour of 5-aminolevulinic acid [ALA] preincubation, followed by blue light) versus a new modified regimen in which blue light is started immediately after ALA application.

methodsA clinical trial with a bilaterally controlled, intrapatient study design was conducted with 23 patients. Topical 20% ALA was applied to the entire face and/or scalp. On 1 side of the body, blue light was started immediately and continued for either 30, 45, or 60 minutes (simultaneous PDT). On the contralateral side, the blue light began 1 hour after ALA application and lasted 1000 seconds (conventional PDT). Pain was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 10. Actinic keratosis lesion counts were determined by clinical examination and photography.

resultsAll patients experienced significantly less pain during simultaneous illumination than during the conventional regimen. At 3 months after treatment, lesion clearance was nearly identical on the 2 sides, as determined by statistical testing of noninferiority ± 15% margin. LIMITATIONS: Although bilaterally controlled, the study was relatively small. Additional studies are recommended.

conclusionThe modified PDT regimen is essentially painless, yet it provides treatment efficacy similar to a conventional regimen.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAminolevulinic AcidDrug Administration ScheduleFacial DermatosesFemaleHumansKeratosis, ActinicMaleMiddle AgedPainPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsScalp DermatosesTreatment OutcomeAminolevulinic AcidPhotosensitizing Agentsclinical researchoncologyphototherapyskin cancertherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID31525441
PMCPMC8036906
OpenAlexW2972986938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.