Trial reportThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2020
Development of a novel Ara h 2 hypoallergen with no IgE binding or anaphylactogenic activity.
Trial report in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral and Skin Sensitisation to Peanut Show Different Immunological Features in Brown Norway Rats.Scandinavian journal of immunology · 2025Article
- Molecular Allergology: Epitope Discovery and Its Application for Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy of Food Allergy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Advances in Allergen Immunotherapy and Safety.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Effect of pH-Shift Treatment on IgE-Binding Capacity and Conformational Structures of Peanut Protein.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Precision engineering for localization, validation, and modification of allergenic epitopes.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024Review
- Immunodominant conformational and linear IgE epitopes lie in a single segment of Ara h 2.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022Article
- Are Physicochemical Properties Shaping the Allergenic Potency of Plant Allergens?Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
- The Effector Function of Allergens.Frontiers in allergy · 2022Review
- The importance of the 2S albumins for allergenicity and cross-reactivity of peanuts, tree nuts, and sesame seeds.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021Review
- The Major Peanut Allergen Ara h 2 Produced inFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- From Allergen Molecules to Molecular Immunotherapy of Nut Allergy: A Hard Nut to Crack.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Review
- Novel Approaches in the Inhibition of IgE-Induced Mast Cell Reactivity in Food Allergy.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Review
- Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: The con argument.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Review
- Dynamics Rationalize Proteolytic Susceptibility of the Major Birch Pollen Allergen Bet v 1.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- pH-Induced Local Unfolding of the Phl p 6 Pollen Allergen From cpH-MD.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo date, no safe allergen-specific immunotherapy for patients with peanut allergy is available. Previous trials were associated with severe side effects.
objectiveWe sought to determine the relative importance of conformational and linear IgE-binding epitopes of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 and to produce a hypoallergenic variant with abolished anaphylactogenic activity.
methodsWild-type Ara h 2 and a mutant lacking the loops containing linear IgE epitopes were produced in insect cells. Conformational IgE epitopes were removed by unfolding these proteins through reduction and alkylation. IgE binding was tested by means of ELISA with sera from 48 Ara h 2-sensitized patients with peanut allergy. Basophil activation and T-cell proliferation were tested with blood samples from selected patients. Anaphylactogenic potency was tested by using intraperitoneal challenge of mice sensitized intragastrically to peanut extract.
resultsPatients' IgE recognized conformational and linear epitopes in a patient-specific manner. The unfolded mutant lacking both types of epitopes displayed significantly lower IgE binding (median ELISA OD, 0.03; interquartile range, 0.01-0.06) than natural Ara h 2 (median ELISA OD, 0.99; interquartile range, 0.90-1.03; P < .01). Basophil activation by unfolded mutant Ara h 2 was low (median area under the curve, 72 vs 138 for native wild-type Ara h 2; P < .05), but its ability to induce T-cell proliferation was retained. Unfolded mutants without conformational epitopes did not induce anaphylaxis in peanut-sensitized mice.
conclusionsBy removing conformational and linear IgE epitopes, a hypoallergenic Ara h 2 mutant with abolished IgE binding and anaphylactogenic potency but retained T-cell activation was generated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.