Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31525384›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2020

Development of a novel Ara h 2 hypoallergen with no IgE binding or anaphylactogenic activity.

Angelika Tscheppe, Dieter Palmberger, Leonie van Rijt, Tanja Kalic, Vanessa Mayr, Chiara Palladino, Claudia Kitzmüller, Wolfgang Hemmer, Christine Hafner, Merima Bublin and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Effector Function of Allergens.Frontiers in allergy · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. The Major Peanut Allergen Ara h 2 Produced inFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: The con argument.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Angelika TscheppeInstitute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dieter PalmbergerDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Leonie van RijtDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tanja KalicInstitute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Vanessa MayrInstitute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Chiara PalladinoInstitute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Claudia KitzmüllerInstitute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang HemmerFAZ-Floridsdorf Allergy Center, Vienna, Austria.
Christine HafnerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital St Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, St Pölten, and the Karl Landsteiner Institute for Dermatological Research, St Pölten, Austria.
Merima BublinInstitute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ronald van ReeDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reingard GrabherrDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Christian RadauerInstitute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: christian.radauer@muv.ac.at.
Heimo BreitenederInstitute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLBOKU University · ATKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · ATUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30936Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, no safe allergen-specific immunotherapy for patients with peanut allergy is available. Previous trials were associated with severe side effects.

objectiveWe sought to determine the relative importance of conformational and linear IgE-binding epitopes of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 and to produce a hypoallergenic variant with abolished anaphylactogenic activity.

methodsWild-type Ara h 2 and a mutant lacking the loops containing linear IgE epitopes were produced in insect cells. Conformational IgE epitopes were removed by unfolding these proteins through reduction and alkylation. IgE binding was tested by means of ELISA with sera from 48 Ara h 2-sensitized patients with peanut allergy. Basophil activation and T-cell proliferation were tested with blood samples from selected patients. Anaphylactogenic potency was tested by using intraperitoneal challenge of mice sensitized intragastrically to peanut extract.

resultsPatients' IgE recognized conformational and linear epitopes in a patient-specific manner. The unfolded mutant lacking both types of epitopes displayed significantly lower IgE binding (median ELISA OD, 0.03; interquartile range, 0.01-0.06) than natural Ara h 2 (median ELISA OD, 0.99; interquartile range, 0.90-1.03; P < .01). Basophil activation by unfolded mutant Ara h 2 was low (median area under the curve, 72 vs 138 for native wild-type Ara h 2; P < .05), but its ability to induce T-cell proliferation was retained. Unfolded mutants without conformational epitopes did not induce anaphylaxis in peanut-sensitized mice.

conclusionsBy removing conformational and linear IgE epitopes, a hypoallergenic Ara h 2 mutant with abolished IgE binding and anaphylactogenic potency but retained T-cell activation was generated.

Indexed as

2S Albumins, PlantAntigens, PlantMutationAdolescentAdultAmino Acid SequenceAnaphylaxisAnimalsBasophilsChildChild, PreschoolEpitopesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EInfant2S Albumins, PlantAntigens, PlantAra h 2 allergen, Arachis hypogaeaEpitopesImmunoglobulin EAra h 2epitopeshypoallergenimmunotherapymouse modelPeanut allergy

Identifiers

PMID31525384
PMCPMC7100897
OpenAlexW2972629141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.