ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2019
Optimality of the spontaneous prophage induction rate.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research on Prophages in Aquaculture from the Perspective of Paradigm Borrowing: Advances in Pathogen Virulence, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Environmental Regulation.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Tools and approaches to study the human gut virome: from the bench to bioinformatics.mSystems · 2026Review
- Human gut strains ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Isolation, characterization, and whole-genome analysis of the novel temperate bacteriophage Ph-p5 infecting Glutamicibacter halophytocola.Archives of virology · 2025Article
- Biochemical characterisation and production kinetics of high molecular-weight (HMW) putative antibacterial proteins of insect pathogenic Brevibacillus laterosporus isolates.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Lytic and temperate phage naturally coexist in a dynamic population model.The ISME journal · 2024Article
- The value of information gathering in phage-bacteria warfare.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- An Eco-evolutionary Model on Surviving Lysogeny Through Grounding and Accumulation of Prophages.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Article
- Characterization of a New TemperatePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Two modes of evolution shape bacterial strain diversity in the mammalian gut for thousands of generations.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Conjugative plasmid transfer is limited by prophages but can be overcome by high conjugation rates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- The human virome: assembly, composition and host interactions.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021Review
- From Bench to Keyboard and Back Again: A Brief History of Lambda Phage Modeling.Annual review of biophysics · 2021Review
- Article
- Computational Basis for On-Demand Production of Diversified Therapeutic Phage Cocktails.mSystems · 2020Article
- Genetically similar temperate phages form coalitions with their shared host that lead to niche-specific fitness effects.The ISME journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lysogens are bacterial cells that have survived after genomically incorporating the DNA of temperate bacteriophages infecting them. If an infection results in lysogeny, the lysogen continues to grow and divide normally, seemingly unaffected by the integrated viral genome known as a prophage. However, the prophage can still have an impact on the host's phenotype and overall fitness in certain environments. Additionally, the prophage within the lysogen can activate the lytic pathway via spontaneous prophage induction (SPI), killing the lysogen and releasing new progeny phages. These new phages can then lyse or lysogenize other susceptible nonlysogens, thereby impacting the competition between lysogens and nonlysogens. In a scenario with differing growth rates, it is not clear whether SPI would be beneficial or detrimental to the lysogens since it kills the host cell but also attacks nonlysogenic competitors, either lysing or lysogenizing them. Here we study the evolutionary dynamics of a mixture of lysogens and nonlysogens and derive general conditions on SPI rates for lysogens to displace nonlysogens. We show that there exists an optimal SPI rate for bacteriophage λ and explain why it is so low. We also investigate the impact of stochasticity and conclude that even at low cell numbers SPI can still provide an advantage to the lysogens. These results corroborate recent experimental studies showing that lower SPI rates are advantageous for phage-phage competition, and establish theoretical bounds on the SPI rate in terms of ecological and environmental variables associated with lysogens having a competitive advantage over their nonlysogenic counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.