Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31525218›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Development of an international external quality assurance program for HIV-1 incidence using the Limiting Antigen Avidity assay.

Sheila M Keating, Wes Rountree, Eduard Grebe, Andrea L Pappas, Mars Stone, Dylan Hampton, Christopher A Todd, Marek S Poniewierski, Ana Sanchez, Cassandra G Porth and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sheila M KeatingVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Wes RountreeDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Eduard GrebeVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Andrea L PappasDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Mars StoneVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Dylan HamptonVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Christopher A ToddDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Marek S PoniewierskiDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Ana SanchezDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Cassandra G PorthDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Thomas N DennyDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Michael P BuschVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1446-125X
EQAPOL Limiting Antigen (LAg) Incidence Assay External Quality Assurance (EQA) Program

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000045CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201700061C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory assays for identifying recent HIV-1 infections are widely used for estimating incidence in cross-sectional population-level surveys in global HIV-1surveillance. Adequate assay and laboratory performance are required to ensure accurate incidence estimates. The NIAID-supported External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) established a proficiency testing program for the most widely-used incidence assay, the HIV-1 Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA (LAg), with US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-approved kits manufactured by Sedia Biosciences Corporation and Maxim Biomedical. The objective of this program is to monitor the performance of participating laboratories. Four rounds of blinded external proficiency (EP) panels were distributed to up to twenty testing sites (7 North American, 5 African, 4 Asian, 2 South American and 2 European). These panels consisted of ten plasma samples: three blinded well-characterized HIV-1-seropositive samples that were included as replicates and an HIV-negative control. The seropositive samples spanned the dynamic range of the assay and are categorized as either recent or long-term infection. Participating sites performed the assay according to manufacturers' instructions and completed an online survey to gather information on kit manufacturer, lot of kit used, laboratory procedures and the experience of technicians. On average, fifteen sites participated in each round of testing, with an average of four sites testing with only the Maxim assay, seven testing with only the Sedia assay and five sites utilizing both assays. Overall, the Sedia and Maxim assays yielded similar infection status categorization across the laboratories; however, for most of the nine HIV+ samples tested, there were significant differences in the optical density readouts, ODn (N = 8) and OD (N = 7), between LAg kit manufacturers (p < 0.05 based on mixed effects models. The EQAPOL LAg program is important for monitoring laboratory performance as well as detecting variations between manufacturers of HIV-1incidence assays.

Indexed as

Antigens, ViralCross-Sectional StudiesHIV-1HIV AntigensHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansIncidenceLaboratoriesLaboratory Proficiency TestingSerologic TestsViral LoadAntigens, ViralHIV Antigens

Identifiers

PMID31525218
PMCPMC6746377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.