Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31525141›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of vision science2019

Origins of Refractive Errors: Environmental and Genetic Factors.

Elise N Harb, Christine F Wildsoet

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of vision science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamic changes in ocular shape during human development and its implications for retina fovea formation.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elise N HarbSchool of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; email: harbe@berkeley.edu, wildsoet@berkeley.edu.
Christine F WildsoetSchool of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; email: harbe@berkeley.edu, wildsoet@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Objectively and dynamically measured human behaviors and their role in myopia developmentK23EY027851 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARB, ELISE N · 2018 to 2021
$765k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY027851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refractive errors are the product of a mismatch between the axial length of the eye and its optical power, creating blurred vision. Uncorrected refractive errors are the second leading cause of worldwide blindness. One refractive error currently attracting significant scientific interest is myopia, mostly owing to the recent rise in its prevalence worldwide and associated ocular disease burden. This increase in myopia prevalence has also been rapid, suggesting environmental influences in addition to any genetic influences on eye growth. This review defines refractive errors, describes their prevalence, and presents evidence for the influence of genetic and environmental factors related to refractive error development.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionAnimalsAstigmatismAxial Length, EyeEmmetropiaHumansHyperopiaMyopiaRefractive Errorsastigmatismaxial lengthemmetropizationhyperopiamyopiarefractive error

Identifiers

PMID31525141
PMCPMC11827892
OpenAlexW2974377714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.