Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31525133›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019

Rhyme Production Strategies Distinguish Stuttering Recovery and Persistence.

Katelyn Gerwin, Françoise Brosseau-Lapré, Barbara Brown, Sharon Christ, Christine Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Clinical Characteristics Associated With Stuttering Persistence: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katelyn GerwinDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Françoise Brosseau-LapréDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Barbara BrownDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Sharon ChristDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Christine WeberDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USGoogle (United States) · US

Funding

PHYSIOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF STUTTERINGR01DC000559 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI SMITH, ANNE, WEBER, CHRISTINE M · 1989 to 2017
$9.4M
Diversity SupplementT32DC000030 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI Arielle Borovsky, Preeti M. Sivasankar · 1991 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000559NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The primary aim of the current study was to examine the developing phonological awareness of 4- to 5-year-old children who stutter (CWS) in relation to eventual recovery (CWS-eRec) or persistance (CWS-ePer) in stuttering, accounting for the presence of typical speech (TS) production or speech sound disorder (SSD). Method In the 1st year of a 5-year longitudinal study, 37 children who do not stutter (CWNS) and 48 CWS completed a rhyme discrimination and a rhyme production task from the Phonological Awareness Test-Second Edition (Robertson & Salter, 2007). Using data from their last year of participation, CWS were classified into CWS-ePer and CWS-eRec. Each CWS group was further divided into TS and SSD groups based on speech production abilities at the time of the rhyme tasks. Accuracy on the rhyme tasks was compared. Groups were also compared on strategies used to generate correct and incorrect responses for the rhyme production task (e.g., real-word correct, nonword correct, semantic association, repeated cues). Results All groups performed similarly on the rhyme discrimination task. On the rhyme production task, CWS-ePer-SSD and CWS-eRec-SSD performed with less accuracy than CWNS, but CWS-ePer-TS, CWS-eRec-TS, and CWNS achieved similar task accuracy. On correct rhyme production trials, CWS-ePer-TS created more nonword rhymes than real-word rhymes. CWS-ePer-TS used the nonword strategy at 1.88 times the CWNS rate. CWS-eRec-TS fell between CWS-ePer-TS and CWNS in use of the nonword strategy. Conclusions Reliance on a nonword strategy for rhyme production in CWS-ePer-TS may reflect differences in underlying phonological representations and ease of phonological access to the lexicon compared to CWNS.

Indexed as

PhoneticsSemanticsChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSpeechSpeech Production MeasurementSpeech Sound DisorderStuttering

Identifiers

PMID31525133
PMCPMC6808341
OpenAlexW2973614103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.