Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31525078›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2019

Automated and Interpretable Patient ECG Profiles for Disease Detection, Tracking, and Discovery.

Geoffrey H Tison, Jeffrey Zhang, Francesca N Delling, Rahul C Deo

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey H TisonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (G.H.T., F.N.D., R.C.D.), University of California, San Francisco.
Jeffrey ZhangCardiovascular Research Institute (J.Z.), University of California, San Francisco.
Francesca N DellingDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (G.H.T., F.N.D., R.C.D.), University of California, San Francisco.
Rahul C DeoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (G.H.T., F.N.D., R.C.D.), University of California, San Francisco.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Machine learning for the automated identification and tracking of rare myocardial diseasesR01HL140731 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MACRAE, CALUM A., SHAH, SANJIV J · 2018 to 2021
$2.8M
Resolving Incomplete Penetrance in the Cardiomyopathies and ChannelopathiesDP2HL123228 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DEO, RAHUL CHANDRAKANT · 2013 to 2013
$2.4M
Dynamic prediction of heart failure using real-time functional status and EHR data in the ambulatory settingK23HL135274 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI TISON, GEOFFREY H · 2018 to 2022
$999k
NHLBI NIH HHS DP2 HL123228NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL135274NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL140731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ECG remains the most widely used diagnostic test for characterization of cardiac structure and electrical activity. We hypothesized that parallel advances in computing power, machine learning algorithms, and availability of large-scale data could substantially expand the clinical inferences derived from the ECG while at the same time preserving interpretability for medical decision-making. METHODS AND

resultsWe identified 36 186 ECGs from the University of California, San Francisco database that would enable training of models for estimation of cardiac structure or function or detection of disease. We segmented the ECG into standard component waveforms and intervals using a novel combination of convolutional neural networks and hidden Markov models and evaluated this segmentation by comparing resulting electrical intervals against 141 864 measurements produced during the clinical workflow. We then built a patient-level ECG profile, a 725-element feature vector and used this profile to train and interpret machine learning models for examples of cardiac structure (left ventricular mass, left atrial volume, and mitral annulus e-prime) and disease (pulmonary arterial hypertension, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloid, and mitral valve prolapse). ECG measurements derived from the convolutional neural network-hidden Markov model segmentation agreed with clinical estimates, with median absolute deviations as a fraction of observed value of 0.6% for heart rate and 4% for QT interval. Models trained using patient-level ECG profiles enabled surprising quantitative estimates of left ventricular mass and mitral annulus e' velocity (median absolute deviation of 16% and 19%, respectively) with good discrimination for left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction as binary traits. Model performance using our approach for disease detection demonstrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 for pulmonary arterial hypertension, 0.91 for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 0.86 for cardiac amyloid, and 0.77 for mitral valve prolapse.

conclusionsModern machine learning methods can extend the 12-lead ECG to quantitative applications well beyond its current uses while preserving the transparency that is so fundamental to clinical care.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyHeart RateMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, AutomatedCardiovascular DiseasesDatabases, FactualHumansMarkov ChainsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedTime Factorsheart ratehypertensionmachine learningmitral valve prolapsework flow

Identifiers

PMID31525078
PMCPMC6951431
OpenAlexW2831775039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.