Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31524833›Full record

ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2020

Clinical and Device-based Metrics of Gait and Balance in Diagnosing Youth Concussion.

Daniel J Corwin, Catherine C McDonald, Kristy B Arbogast, Fairuz N Mohammed, Kristina B Metzger, Melissa R Pfeiffer, Declan A Patton, Colin M Huber, Susan S Margulies, Matthew F Grady and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Neurophysiological Effects of Repeated Soccer Heading in Youth.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel J Corwin
Catherine C McDonald
Kristy B Arbogast
Fairuz N MohammedCenter for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Kristina B MetzgerCenter for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Melissa R PfeifferCenter for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Declan A PattonCenter for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Colin M HuberCenter for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Susan S Margulies
Matthew F Grady
Christina L Master

Funding

Objective Translational Multi-domain Early Concussion AssessmentR01NS097549 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ARBOGAST, KRISTY, MARGULIES, SUSAN SHEPS · 2017 to 2021
$4.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluate the discriminatory ability of two clinical measures and one device-based measure of gait and balance for concussed youth.

methodsWe enrolled 81 cases and 90 controls age 14-18 yr old from August 2017 to June 2018. Controls were recruited from a suburban high school, and cases were recruited from the concussion program of an academic pediatric tertiary care center. Tests included two clinical measures: 1) complex tandem gait, scored as sway/errors walking forward and backward eyes open and closed; 2) Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS), scored as total number of errors on three standing tasks; and one device-based measure; 3) Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) using the Biodex Biosway Balance System, scored as a sway index. Sensitivity, specificity, ideal cutpoint, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for all test components.

resultsIdeal cutpoint for total number of sway/errors for tandem gait = 5, sensitivity 41%, specificity 90%. Ideal cutpoint for total mBESS errors = 4, sensitivity 55%, specificity 75%. Ideal cutpoint for mCTSIB = 1.37, sensitivity 37%, specificity 88%. Among each test, some individual components outperformed overall composites, in particular tandem gait (specificity forward eyes open = 99%, sensitivity backward eyes closed = 81%). Among the 40 cases and 65 controls with all three assessments, AUC (95% CI) for tandem gait = 0.63 (0.52,0.75), mBESS = 0.70 (0.60,0.81), and mCTSIB = 0.54 (0.42,0.66).

conclusionsA device-based measure of balance did not produce better discriminatory ability than two clinical assessments. Complex tandem gait has the additional benefit of being an easy-to-perform and graded test with highly sensitive and specific individual components.

Indexed as

Gait AnalysisPostural BalanceAdolescentBrain ConcussionHumansPredictive Value of TestsVestibular Function TestsYouth Sports

Identifiers

PMID31524833
PMCPMC7024041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.