Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31524335›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil for second-line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal.

Angélique Saint, Ludovic Evesque, Alexander T Falk, Gérard Cavaglione, Lucile Montagne, Karen Benezery, Eric Francois

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angélique SaintDigestive Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3183-1611
Ludovic EvesqueDigestive Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Alexander T FalkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Gérard CavaglioneDigestive Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Lucile MontagneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Karen BenezeryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Eric FrancoisDigestive Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the anal canal are rare and there is no international consensus on their second-line management. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin in combination with radiotherapy is the standard for locally advanced forms but its efficacy in metastatic stage has never been evaluated. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe report a retrospective analysis of patients treated with 5-FU and mitomycin from 2000 to 2017 in our institution for a metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum-based regimen. The main outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity.

resultsNineteen patients, 15 women and four men, with a median age of 57 years were identified (range, 40-79 years). Patients received a median of three cycles (1-7) of mitomycin 5-FU. A dose reduction was necessary in six patients (31.6%), one patient had to discontinue treatment following toxicity and no death was due to treatment toxicity was reported. An objective response was observed in five patients (26.4%, 95% CI 6.6-46.2) including one complete response, six patients (31.6%, 95% CI 10.7-52.5) showed tumor stabilization. Median PFS and OS were 3 months [95% CI 1-5] and 7 months [95% CI 2.2-11.8]. Responder had a median duration of response of 4 months [95% CI 1.8-6.1] and one patient had 23 months duration of response. No significant difference was noted for PFS and OS for patients previously treated with mitomycin and 5-FU at a local stage.

conclusionMitomycin and 5-FU regimen provides tumor control with acceptable tolerance. It is an option for patients with metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. [Correction added on 9 October 2019, after first online publication: '5-FU' was inadvertently removed from the Results and Conclusion and has now been added to the text.].

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAnus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMitomycinProgression-Free SurvivalAntineoplastic AgentsFluorouracilMitomycin5-fluorouracilanal canalcancerchemotherapymetastasismitomycin

Identifiers

PMID31524335
PMCPMC6853831
OpenAlexW2974183337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.