Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31524124›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019

Specialist healthcare services for UK care home residents: a latent class analysis.

Claire Hargreaves, Sue Tucker, Jane Hughes, Rebecca Hays, David Challis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Uncovering Four Types of Care Coordination in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claire HargreavesResearch Associate, Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sue TuckerResearch Fellow, Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jane HughesSenior Research Fellow, Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rebecca HaysResearch Assistant, Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David ChallisProfessor, Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health C088/CM/UMDC-P113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify discrete approaches to specialist healthcare support for older care home residents in the UK and to estimate their prevalence.

backgroundInternationally, a range of new initiatives are emerging to meet the multiple and complex healthcare needs of care home residents. However, little is known about their relative effectiveness and, given their heterogeneity, a classification scheme is required to enable research staff to explore this.

methodA UK survey collected information on the funding, age, coverage, aims, staffing and activities of 64 specialist care home support services. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to allocate the sample into subgroups with similar characteristics.

findingsThree classes were identified. Class 1 (55% of sample) contained services with a high probability of providing scheduled input (regular preplanned visits) and support for all residents and a moderate probability of undertaking medication management, but a low probability of training care home staff ('predominantly direct care'). Class 2 (23% of sample) had a moderate/high probability of providing scheduled input, support for all residents, medication management and training ('direct and indirect care'). Class 3 (22% of sample) had a low probability of providing scheduled input, support for all residents and medication management, but a high probability of providing training for care home staff ('predominantly indirect care'). Consultants were more likely to be members of services in Class 1 than Class 2, and Class 2 than Class 3.

conclusionsLCA offers a promising approach to the creation of a taxonomy of specialist care home support services. The skills and knowledge required by healthcare staff vary between classes, raising important issues for service design. The proposed classification can be used to explore the extent to which different organisational forms are associated with better resident, process and service outcomes.

Indexed as

SpecializationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Services for the AgedHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedNursing HomesQuality of Health CareState MedicineUnited Kingdomcare homeslatent class analysislong-term caremodels of careolder people

Identifiers

PMID31524124
PMCPMC6749553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.