Illuminating human disease: The potential of in vivo imaging for preclinical research and diagnostics.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A non-antibiotic genetic selection system enables near-infrared in vivo imaging and evaluation of antibiotic efficacy for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.The Journal of antibiotics · 2026
   Article
2. Targeted Bioluminescent Imaging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Nanocarrier-Complexed EGFR-Binding Affibody-Gaussia Luciferase Fusion Protein.Pharmaceutics · 2023
   Article
3. Content aware image restoration improves spatiotemporal resolution in luminescence imaging.Communications biology · 2023
   Article
4. Ultraviolet Fluorescence Photography-Choosing the Correct Filters for Imaging.Journal of imaging · 2022
   Article
5. Illuminating human disease: The potential of in vivo imaging for preclinical research and diagnostics.EMBO reports · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as