Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523872›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2019

Consistency of self-reported drug use among electronic dance music party attendees.

Joseph J Palamar, Austin Le, Patricia Acosta, Charles M Cleland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Substance Use and Attendance Motives of Electronic Dance Music (EDM) Event Attendees: A Survey Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph J PalamarDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8565-9415
Austin LeDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Patricia AcostaDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Charles M ClelandDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Population Council · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary Theoretical Svnthesis and Development CoreP30DA011041 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Holly Hagan · 1998 to 2026
$38.9M
Drug use among nightclub and dance festival attendees in New York CityR01DA044207 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PALAMAR, JOSEPH J · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
Development of a Rapid Survey to Detect Use of New and Emerging DrugsK01DA038800 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PALAMAR, JOSEPH J · 2015 to 2019
$879k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA038800NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA011041NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimsLongitudinal studies have found that recanting of drug use is common. We investigate the extent to which individuals in a high-risk population-electronic dance music (EDM) party attendees-provide inconsistent reports of drug use. DESIGN AND

methodsNine hundred and thirty-three EDM party attendees were intercept-surveyed before entering randomly selected parties in 2017. A quarter (n = 236) completed the optional follow-up survey (63.1% of those providing an email address to be contacted for follow up). We compared self-reported past-year drug use on baseline and follow-up surveys (mean = 3.6 days post-baseline) among those who completed both. Predictors for providing discordant responses were also examined.

resultsAbout 42.4% provided a discordant response between surveys, but discord regarding reported use of individual drugs (measured in changes in absolute percentage) ranged from 0.0% to 5.1%. At follow up, prevalence of reported use of LSD decreased (by 3.8%, P = 0.013) and prevalence of reported use of shrooms also decreased (by 5.1%, P = 0.005); however, test-retest reliability was strong or almost perfect for all 17 drugs (κ range: 0.88-1.00). Those reporting the use of a higher number of drugs at baseline were at increased risk of providing discordant responses. Those surveyed outside of festivals were less likely to provide more discordant responses than those surveyed outside of nightclubs. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsAlthough reporting of drug use was very reliable in this high-risk population, inconsistent self-reported use of some drugs was still common. Research is needed to determine how to acquire more accurate responses in this population at the point of recruitment without relying on follow-up surveys.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsSelf ReportAdolescentAdultDancingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMusicPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultIllicit Drugsdata collection, drug useepidemiologyreproducibility of resultssurvey methods

Identifiers

PMID31523872
PMCPMC6858931
OpenAlexW2973974953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.