Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523759›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2020

Adherence to Anticoagulation and Risk of Stroke Among Medicare Beneficiaries Newly Diagnosed with Atrial Fibrillation.

Inmaculada Hernandez, Meiqi He, Maria M Brooks, Samir Saba, Walid F Gellad

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. COVID-19 Diagnosis, Oral Anticoagulation, and Stroke Risk in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inmaculada HernandezDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3609 Forbes Avenue, Room 103, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. inh3@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0118-4986
Meiqi HeDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3609 Forbes Avenue, Room 103, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Maria M BrooksDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Samir SabaHeart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Walid F GelladDivision of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Patient and System-Level Determinants of Oral Anticoagulation Use in Atrial FibrillationK01HL142847 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HERNANDEZ, INMACULADA · 2018 to 2022
$798k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL142847NHLBI NIH HHS K01HL142847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this study was to compare the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) with adherent use of oral anticoagulation (OAC), non-adherent use, and non-use of OAC.

methodsUsing 2013-2016 Medicare claims data, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF in 2014-2015 and collected prescriptions filled for OAC in the 12 months after AF diagnosis (n = 39,272). We categorized participants each day into three time-dependent exposures: adherent use (≥ 80% of the previous 30 days covered with OAC), non-adherent use (0-80% covered with OAC), and non-use (0%). We constructed Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the association between time-dependent exposures and time to stroke, adjusting for demographics and clinical characteristics.

resultsThe sample included 39,272 patients. Study participants spent 35.0% of the follow-up period in the adherent use exposure category, 10.9% in the non-adherent category, and 54.0% in the non-use category. OAC adherent use [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.74] and non-adherent use (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.57-0.95) were associated with lower hazards of stroke than non-use. Adherent use of DOAC (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.42-0.69) and warfarin (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.89) was associated with lower risk of stroke than non-use, but the risk of stroke did not statistically differ between DOAC and warfarin adherent use (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.56-1.04). DISCUSSION: Although adherence to OAC reduces stroke risk by nearly 40%, newly diagnosed AF patients in Medicare adhere to OAC on average only one third of the first year after AF diagnosis.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdministration, OralAgedAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStrokeTime FactorsUnited StatesWarfarinAnticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID31523759
PMCPMC7073283
OpenAlexW2974923570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.