ArticleCureus2019
National Trends and Hospitalizations Related to Pancreatic Cancer in Acute Pancreatitis Patients: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Study.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Costs of Hospital and Emergency Department Utilisation in the First Three Years After Diagnosis for Adults Diagnosed With Pancreatic Cancer in Queensland, Australia.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Acute Pancreatitis as the Initial Presentation of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma does not Impact Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Curative Intent Surgery: A Study of the French Surgical Association.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus and excess intra-pancreatic fat deposition as harbingers of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Sex differences in outcomes of acute pancreatitis: Findings from a nationwide analysis.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the common cancers in the United States (U.S.) and is associated with high mortality and morbidity. In spite of the modest improvement in survival, cancer care costs including PC continue to rise and inpatient costs contribute a significant chunk to cancer care, which is often ignored. Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a rare manifestation of PC. This study aims to determine the national trends and associated health care utilization of PC patients hospitalized with AP in the U.S. Methods We used National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to extract data for patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of PC in AP in 2016 using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, and Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. The analysis included disease etiologies, age, race, sex, hospital region, hospital size, institution type, mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and commonly associated comorbidities were correlated. Results There were 250 patients with a discharge diagnosis of PC in patients admitted with AP. Most of the patients were whites (76.6%) with the mean age of 39.42 ± 2.51 years, had Medicare (63.26%) as primary insurance, were from Southern region (46%) and had higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (76.00% with CCI > = 3). The mean hospital charges were $48,462.13, and mean LOS was 5.24 days. The LOS was significantly impacted by race, hospital region, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and comorbidities such as dementia, smoking, and seizure. Out of the 250 patients admitted with PC, 245 patients (98%) were discharged alive. Conclusions Our study shows a downward trend in LOS, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality as compared to other studies despite PC and AP presenting together versus PC with or without other etiologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.