Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523553›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

Evaluation of Male Infertility Prevalence with Clinical Outcomes in Middle Anatolian Region.

Ünal Öztekin, Mehmet Caniklioğlu, Sercan Sarı, Volkan Selmi, Abdullah Gürel, Levent Işıkay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Correlation of Novel Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms ofInternational journal of fertility & sterility · 2022
    Article
  8. Lack of trusted diagnostic tools for undetermined male infertility.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ünal ÖztekinUrology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, TUR.
Mehmet CaniklioğluUrology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, TUR.
Sercan SarıUrology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, TUR.
Volkan SelmiUrology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, TUR.
Abdullah GürelUrology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, TUR.
Levent IşıkayUrology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivethe aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of male factor infertility with the clinical patterns of patients in our region. MATERIALS AND

methodsthis is a descriptive retrospective study of 406 infertility cases presented at our urology clinic from February 2018 to February 2019. We assessed hormone and physical examination data, semen analysis results, the contribution of male and female factors to infertility, and types of infertility (i.e., primary or secondary).

resultsthe age of the male patients ranged from 18 to 50 years, with a mean of 30 ± 5 years. Asthenozoospermia was the leading cause of male factor infertility in 77 patients (19%). Male factors as the sole cause of infertility were found in 185 (45.6%) couples. Female factors as the sole cause were found in 32 couples (7.9%). Primary infertility was determined in 314 (77.3%) patients, and 92 (22.7%) had secondary infertility.

conclusionaccording to our results, the male infertility rate was high among couples reporting infertility. Couples should be informed about the causes of infertility, which may be due factors attributed to either sex.

Indexed as

male infertilityprevalenceprimary infertility

Identifiers

PMID31523553
PMCPMC6741393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.