ArticlePeerJ2019
HiLDA: a statistical approach to investigate differences in mutational signatures.
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Dirichlet-multinomial mixed model for determining differential abundance of mutational signatures.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Diffsig: Associating Risk Factors with Mutational Signatures.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- Mutational Signatures: From Methods to Mechanisms.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2021Article
- Article
- Mutational signatures in colon cancer.BMC research notes · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a hierarchical latent Dirichlet allocation model (HiLDA) for characterizing somatic mutation data in cancer. The method allows us to infer mutational patterns and their relative frequencies in a set of tumor mutational catalogs and to compare the estimated frequencies between tumor sets. We apply our method to two datasets, one containing somatic mutations in colon cancer by the time of occurrence, before or after tumor initiation, and the second containing somatic mutations in esophageal cancer by sex, age, smoking status, and tumor site. In colon cancer, the relative frequencies of mutational patterns were found significantly associated with the time of occurrence of mutations. In esophageal cancer, the relative frequencies were significantly associated with the tumor site. Our novel method provides higher statistical power for detecting differences in mutational signatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.