Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523395›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2019

A novel tumor spheroid model identifies selective enhancement of radiation by an inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation.

Henning Karlsson, Wojciech Senkowski, Mårten Fryknäs, Sharmineh Mansoori, Stig Linder, Joachim Gullbo, Rolf Larsson, Peter Nygren

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henning KarlssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Wojciech SenkowskiDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mårten FryknäsDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sharmineh MansooriDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stig LinderDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Joachim GullboDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rolf LarssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Peter NygrenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for preclinical models that can enable identification of novel radiosensitizing drugs in clinically relevant high-throughput experiments. We used a new high-throughput compatible total cell kill spheroid assay to study the interaction between drugs and radiation in order to identify compounds with radiosensitizing activity. Experimental drugs were compared to known radiosensitizers and cytotoxic drugs clinically used in combination with radiotherapy. VLX600, a novel iron-chelating inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation, potentiated the effect of radiation in tumor spheroids in a synergistic manner. This effect was specific to spheroids and not observed in monolayer cell cultures. In conclusion, the total cell kill spheroid assay is a feasible high-throughput method in the search for novel radiosensitizers. VLX600 shows encouraging characteristics for development as a novel radiosensitizer.

Indexed as

high-throughputhypoxiaradiosensitizerspheroidtumor model

Identifiers

PMID31523395
PMCPMC6731106
OpenAlexW2767973844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.