ArticleInternational journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology2019
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes do not promote the proliferation of cancer cells
Article in International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome-Mediated Delivery of Paclitaxel for Pancreatic Cancer Therapy.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Therapeutic and Diagnostic Roles of MSC-Derived Exosomes in Alzheimer's Disease.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- Harnessing the power of stem cell-derived exosomes: a rejuvenating therapeutic for skin and regenerative medicine.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Innovating Glioma Therapy Using Secretions from Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Target Homeobox and Growth Factor Genes.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2025Article
- Dual impacts of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes on cancer cells: unravelling complex interactions.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Hype or Hope for Skeletal Muscle Anti-Frailty.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Umbilical cord blood plasma-derived exosomes as a novel therapy to reverse liver fibrosis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Article
- Small extracellular vesicles in cancer.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Regenerative Potential and Challenges.Biology · 2021Review
- Extracellular Vesicles in the Tumour Microenvironment: Eclectic Supervisors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Challenges in Clinical Applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- Dual Role of MSC-Derived Exosomes in Tumor Development.Stem cells international · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, the use of Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in clinical therapies have an increased acceleration, while it constitutes two sides of yin-yang with its ameliorating effects in regenerative medicine and promoting effects in carcinogenesis. It has been shown that the treatment activities of MSCs are mediated by paracrine factors secreted. These paracrine factors are transmitting via exosomes secreted from MSCs. With the understanding of this mechanism, cell-free therapies have begun to create a new path in MSC based therapies. At this point, two sides of the yin-yang have once again become controversial. In addition, there are conflicting study results in the literature. Due to this contradiction, we have designed this study to demonstrate the role of MSCs in the carcinogenesis process and we investigated the proliferation effect of MSC-derived exosomes on cancer cell lines. Two parallel experimental setups were established, as an experimental group, the four-different epithelial cancer cell lines and Wharton's Jelly (WJ)-MSC derived exosomes were directly co-cultured with in 6 different concentrations and simultaneously in the control group cells were cultured respectively. PKH-26 labelling was performed for detection of exosome locations in co-cultures. Each group were evaluated by WST-1 and xCelligence assays for proliferation and confirmed with PCNA staining. The results were analysed with paired t-test and Newman-Keuls comparison. The relative comparison demonstrated a significant increase in the rate of proliferation only in exosome co-cultures with WJ-MSCs and it was supported by PCNA staining. Cancer cell lines in co-cultures have not shown any significant increase neither in proliferation assays nor in PCNA staining. MSCs regulate their secretions according to the microenvironment, they have more dominant regenerative feature rather than triggering cancer proliferation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31523364PMC6737426What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.