Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523268›Full record

ArticleObstetric medicine2019

The prevalence and pregnancy outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A retrospective clinical audit review.

Fergus W Gardiner, Ruth McCuaig, Chris Arthur, Thomas Carins, Adam Morton, Josephine Laurie, Teresa Neeman, Boon Lim, Michael J Peek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetric medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ICP: A midwifery perspective.Obstetric medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Obstetric Cholestasis among Pregnant Women Visiting a Tertiary Care Centre.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Update on specific dermatoses of pregnancy.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fergus W GardinerThe Calvary Public Hospital Bruce, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7592-832X
Ruth McCuaigThe Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.
Chris ArthurThe Gold Coast University Health, Gold Coast, Australia.
Thomas CarinsThe Gold Coast University Health, Gold Coast, Australia.
Adam MortonMater Health Services Public Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9887-714X
Josephine LaurieMater Health Services Public Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Teresa NeemanThe Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Boon LimThe Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.
Michael J PeekThe Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine the prevalence and outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

methodsA review comparing intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy pregnancies to all other pregnancies in three tertiary care Australian hospitals over a 36-month period.

resultsThere were 43,876 pregnancies. The prevalence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancies (

conclusionTreated intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in the population described here had similar mortality outcomes although increased special care nursery admission as compared to the general population.

Indexed as

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancyliver function tests, obstetric cholestasis, pruritus, ursodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID31523268
PMCPMC6734627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.