ReviewObstetric medicine2019
Diagnostic imaging in pregnancy: Making informed decisions.
Review in Obstetric medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Maternal and fetal outcomes of spinal tuberculosis in pregnancy: A systematic review and descriptive pooled analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- A Flowchart to Guide Emergency Physicians to Order Radiological Imaging in Pregnant Patients: Findings from an Emergency Department Questionnaire.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparing fetal phantoms with surrogate organs in female phantoms during CT exposure of pregnant patients.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- An audit of CTPA and V/Q scan for investigation of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Exploring pregnant individuals' counseling needs regarding urgent imaging to rule out pulmonary embolism.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Monitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Pregnancy: A Review of the Different Modalities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Pregnancy and Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The radiologist's role in a multidisciplinary approach to cancer in pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- COVID-19 critical illness in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2022Review
- Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- New evidence in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2020Article
- Imaging in Pregnancy Stewardship.Obstetric medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of diagnostic imaging involving ionising radiation may be necessary in pregnancy and requires an assessment of the most appropriate and safest imaging modality which will provide the necessary information balanced with the potential risks to the mother and fetus. In most cases, this will involve a potential fetal radiation dose well below 50 mGy. At these doses, there is no risk of lethality, genetic damage/epigenetic change, teratogenicity, growth impairment or sterility. Older epidemiological data indicating a potential increased cancer risk have been contradicted by newer data and better understanding of the biology of low dose radiation. The linear no-threshold rule has been challenged by many and more realistic estimates of oncogenicity risk along with the potential risks of contrast agents are summarised in this review. Imaging in the pregnant population is increasing in both the number of examinations performed and the number of patients being imaged, with the greatest increase being computed tomography scans. Counselling and obtaining informed consent for imaging that involves radiation requires the clinician to communicate with the woman and her family a realistic estimate of the potential radiation dose to herself and her fetus, to describe and quantitate the risks of this estimated dose, to outline the benefits of the imaging procedure and to respond to any questions or concerns. As almost all diagnostic imaging involves doses below the 50 mGy threshold, clinically indicated investigations should not be withheld during pregnancy. All allied staff must also be well informed to ensure the patient receives a consistent message about the risks and benefits of the proposed test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.