Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523266›Full record

ReviewObstetric medicine2019

The matter of the reproductive microbiome.

Sam Schoenmakers, Regine Steegers-Theunissen, Marijke Faas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetric medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05754645 (The PROMOTE Study, a Pilot), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05754645 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The PROMOTE Study, a Pilot: The Characterization of the Microbiome in Pregnancy and Prediction of Pregnancy Outcomes

TypeobservationalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2022 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsObesity, Maternal, Pregnancy Complications, Gut MicrobiotaArmsBlood withdrawal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Microbial Contributions to Primate Reproduction.Evolutionary anthropology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cells · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sam SchoenmakersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0316-6159
Regine Steegers-TheunissenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marijke FaasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preconceptional presence of microbiota in the female and male reproductive organs suggests that fertilization is taking place in a nonsterile environment and contributes to reproductive success. The concept of embryonic development in a sterile uterus has also been challenged with recent reports of the existence of a microbiome of the placenta, amniotic fluid and the fetal gut in normal, uncomplicated pregnancies. The maternal origins of the microbiota colonising the fetus and its surroundings are unknown as are the mechanisms of maternal-to-fetal transfer. In this review, we aim to highlight the preconception male and female microbiome, the maternal vaginal and gut microbiome during pregnancy and the fetal microbiome, including their possible roles in reproduction, and maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcome.

Indexed as

embryomaternal–fetal medicineMicrobiomepericonceptionplacentapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31523266
PMCPMC6734629
OpenAlexW2803378479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.