Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523231›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2019

Second breast conserving therapy after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence - a 10-year experience of re-irradiation.

Tobias Forster, Sati Akbaba, Daniela Schmitt, David Krug, Rami El Shafie, Jan Oelmann-Avendano, Katja Lindel, Laila König, Nathalie Arians, Denise Bernhardt and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Moderately hypofractionated partial breast reirradiation: early clinical results and dosimetric considerations in the context of 2Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias ForsterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sati AkbabaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniela SchmittDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
David KrugDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rami El ShafieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan Oelmann-AvendanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katja LindelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Municipal Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Laila KönigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nathalie AriansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Denise BernhardtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frederik MarméDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jörg HeilDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christof SohnDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Juliane Hörner-RieberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberger Institut für Radioonkologie · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of post-operative partial breast re-irradiation with multi-catheter brachytherapy after second breast conserving therapy (BCT) in patients with small, low-risk ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween 2008 and 2018, 19 consecutive patients with low-risk IBTR (max. rpT1 cN0 cM0, Her2 negative, preferably positive hormone receptor status) who refused mastectomy were treated with salvage lumpectomy, followed by post-operative partial breast re-irradiation with multi-catheter brachytherapy. Eight patients were irradiated using PDR brachytherapy (49.8-50.4 Gy in pulses of 0.5-0.7 Gy) and 11 patients using HDR brachytherapy (34.2 Gy in fractions of 3.8 Gy or 32 Gy in fractions of 4 Gy). All patients had undergone prior BCT for their primary tumor, followed by adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy. Local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) as well as toxicity were evaluated in the present study.

resultsAfter a median follow-up of 65 months following IBTR (18-120 months), only one second IBTR in 19 patients was diagnosed 77 months after re-irradiation, resulting in a LC rate of 100% at 5 years. DFS and OS rates were both 100% at 5 years following re-irradiation. Except for the above mentioned second IBTR, no regional or distant relapse was recorded. Regarding toxicity, 63% of patients developed adverse events (CTCAE grade ≤ 2), with fibrosis detected in 37% (7/19) of patients, necrosis in 11% (2/19), hyperpigmentation in 47% (9/19), and telangiectasia in 11% (2/19), respectively. No patient showed a high-grade (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) adverse event.

conclusionsIn case of small, low-risk IBTR, adjuvant re-irradiation using multi-catheter brachytherapy is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment method after repeated lumpectomy, and an alternative to mastectomy.

Indexed as

brachytherapybreast canceripsilateral breast tumor recurrencere-irradiationsecond breast conserving therapy

Identifiers

PMID31523231
PMCPMC6737570
OpenAlexW2972160438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.