ArticlePhenomenology and the cognitive sciences2019
Mind and material engagement.
Article in Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- The hierarchical levels of information activities in the subject's psychology and cognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- From chemistry to cognition: the adaptive origins of consciousness under constraint.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Running Around in the Story: Un/Raveling Compositions of Narrative Play.Journal of literacy research : JLR · 2025Article
- Reclaiming ritual in palliative care: A hermeneutic narrative review.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Review
- People are STRANGE: towards a philosophical archaeology of self.Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences · 2025Article
- Re-thinging Embodied and Enactive Psychiatry: A Material Engagement Approach.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2024Article
- The Evolution of Symbolic Thought: At the Intersection of Schizophrenia Psychopathology, Ethnoarchaeology, and Neuroscience.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2024Article
- A computational approach to selective attention in embodied approaches to cognitive archaeology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Review
- Material Engagement Shaping Participation of Children on the Autism Spectrum: Embodiment and Subjectivity in Small-Group Learning.Europe's journal of psychology · 2024Article
- Materiality and Cognitive Development: Contemporary Debates and Empirical Studies in Early Childhood.Europe's journal of psychology · 2024Article
- An Ecological Approach to Conceptual Thinking in Material Engagement.Europe's journal of psychology · 2024Article
- Lessons for Theory from Scientific Domains Where Evidence is Sparse or Indirect.Computational brain & behavior · 2024Article
- Informational Resilience in the Human Cognitive Ecology.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Intentional Understanding Through Action Coordination in Early Triadic Interactions.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2023Article
- How systemic cognition enables epistemic engineering.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Alternative Object Use in Adults and Children: Embodied Cognitive Bases of Creativity.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Psychotherapy as making.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Mark Making and Human Becoming.Journal of archaeological method and theory · 2021Article
- Understanding the effects of materiality on mental health.BJPsych bulletin · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Material Engagement Theory (MET), which forms the focus of this special issue, is a relatively new development within cognitive archaeology and anthropology, but one that has important implications for many adjacent fields of research in phenomenology and the cognitive sciences. In
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.