Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523199›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biological sciences2019

Deletion of

Haitao Wang, Liangcai Shen, Jingyao Chen, Xiaojuan Liu, Tan Tan, Yiqing Hu, Xiaofei Bai, Yuexin Li, Kegong Tian, Ning Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Molecular breeding of pigs in the genome editing era.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Gene Editing for Enhanced Swine Production: Current Advances and Prospects.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Improvements in pig agriculture through gene editing.CABI agriculture and bioscience · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haitao WangState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Liangcai ShenState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Jingyao ChenState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Xiaojuan LiuState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Tan TanState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yiqing HuState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Xiaofei BaiNational Research Center for Veterinary Medicine, Luoyang, Henan Province, China.
Yuexin LiState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Kegong TianNational Research Center for Veterinary Medicine, Luoyang, Henan Province, China.
Ning LiState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoxiang HuState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
China Agricultural University · CNHenan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) caused by PRRS virus (PRRSV) is a severe infectious disease in the swine industry. PRRSV infection is mediated by porcine CD163 (pCD163). Scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain 5 coded by exon 7 of pCD163 is essential for PRRSV infection. In this study, we generated CD163 exon 7 deleted (CD163E7D) pigs using CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homologous recombination and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). The deletion of exon 7 had no adverse effects on CD163-associated functions. Pigs were further challenged with a highly pathogenic PRRSV (HP-PRRSV) strain. The CD163E7D pigs exhibited mild clinical symptoms and had decreased viral loads in blood. All CD163E7D pigs survived the viral challenge, while all the WT pigs displayed severe symptoms, and 2 out of 6 WT pigs died during the challenge. Our results demonstrated that

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD163 AntigenCRISPR-Cas SystemsExonsNuclear Transfer TechniquesPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusReceptors, Cell SurfaceSwineAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD163 AntigenReceptors, Cell SurfaceCD163CRISPR/Cas9Highly pathogenic PRRSVSCNTSRCR 5

Identifiers

PMID31523199
PMCPMC6743298
OpenAlexW2967505635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.