Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523136›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine insights. Reproductive health2019

PCOS and Hyperprolactinemia: what do we know in 2019?

Clémence Delcour, Geoffroy Robin, Jacques Young, Didier Dewailly

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine insights. Reproductive health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07255911 (Cabergoline and Letrozole Compared to Letrozole Alone for Ovulation Induction in Infertile Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07255911 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Cabergoline and Letrozole Compared to Letrozole Alone for Ovulation Induction in Infertile Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorMst.Sumyara KhatunRan2025 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsPCOSArmsLetrozole 0.5mg, Cabergoline 0.5 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clémence DelcourDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Robert-Debré hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Geoffroy RobinCHU Lille, Department of Reproductive Medicine & Lille University, Lille, France.
Jacques YoungDepartment of Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, CHU Kremlin Bicetre, Paris, France.
Didier DewaillyINSERM U1172 Team 2, JPARC, Université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8521-5163
Inserm · FRBicêtre Hospital · FRUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and hyperprolactinemia (HPRL) are the two most common etiologies of anovulation in women. Since the 1950s, some authors think that there is a pathophysiological link between PCOS and HPRL. Since then, many authors have speculated about the link between these two endocrine entities, but no hypothesis proposed so far could ever be confirmed. Furthermore, PCOS and HPRL are frequent endocrine diseases and a fortuitous association cannot be excluded. The evolution of knowledge about PCOS and HPRL shows that studies conducted before the 2000s are obsolete given current knowledge. Indeed, most of the studies were conducted before consensual diagnosis criteria of PCOS and included small numbers of patients. In addition, the investigation of HPRL in these studies relied on obsolete methods and did not look for the presence of macroprolactinemia. It is therefore possible that HPRL that has been attributed to PCOS corresponded in fact to macroprolactinemia or to pituitary microadenomas of small sizes that could not be detected with the imaging methods of the time. Recent studies that have conducted a rigorous etiological investigation show that HPRL found in PCOS correspond either to non-permanent increase of prolactin levels, to macroprolactinemia or to other etiologies. None of this recent study found HPRL related to PCOS in these patients. Thus, the link between PCOS and HPRL seems to be more of a myth than a well-established medical reality and we believe that the discovery of an HPRL in a PCOS patient needs a standard etiological investigation of HPRL.

Indexed as

hyperandrogenismHyperprolactinemiamacroprolactinemiaPCOSprolactinoma

Identifiers

PMID31523136
PMCPMC6734626
OpenAlexW2973050346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.