Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31523127›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary bioinformatics online2019

Emergence of Hierarchical Modularity in Evolving Networks Uncovered by Phylogenomic Analysis.

Gustavo Caetano-Anollés, M Fayez Aziz, Fizza Mughal, Frauke Gräter, Ibrahim Koç, Kelsey Caetano-Anollés, Derek Caetano-Anollés

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary bioinformatics online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Network architectures supporting learnability.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Gustavo Caetano-AnollésEvolutionary Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Crop Sciences, C.R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, and Illinois Informatics Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5854-4121
M Fayez AzizEvolutionary Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Crop Sciences, C.R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, and Illinois Informatics Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Fizza MughalEvolutionary Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Crop Sciences, C.R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, and Illinois Informatics Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Frauke GräterHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ibrahim KoçDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Gebze Technical University, Gebze, Turkey.
Kelsey Caetano-AnollésDivision of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Derek Caetano-AnollésEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEGebze Technical University · TRHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies · DESeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Networks describe how parts associate with each other to form integrated systems which often have modular and hierarchical structure. In biology, network growth involves two processes, one that unifies and the other that diversifies. Here, we propose a biphasic (bow-tie) theory of module emergence. In the first phase, parts are at first weakly linked and associate variously. As they diversify, they compete with each other and are often selected for performance. The emerging interactions constrain their structure and associations. This causes parts to self-organize into modules with tight linkage. In the second phase, variants of the modules diversify and become new parts for a new generative cycle of higher level organization. The paradigm predicts the rise of hierarchical modularity in evolving networks at different timescales and complexity levels. Remarkably, phylogenomic analyses uncover this emergence in the rewiring of metabolomic and transcriptome-informed metabolic networks, the nanosecond dynamics of proteins, and evolving networks of metabolism, elementary functionomes, and protein domain organization.

Indexed as

Accretionbiphasic bow-tie patternevolutionary diversificationmolecular structurephylogenomic analysisribosome

Identifiers

PMID31523127
PMCPMC6728656
OpenAlexW2971862671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.