Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31522922›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2019

Health Center-Based Community-Supported Agriculture: An RCT.

Seth A Berkowitz, Jessica O'Neill, Edward Sayer, Naysha N Shahid, Maegan Petrie, Sophie Schouboe, Megan Saraceno, Rochelle Bellin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03231592 (Im), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03231592 naunknown statusnot on this map

Im(Proving) the CSA Model

TypeinterventionalSponsorCommunity Health Center of Franklin CountyRan2017 to 2018Enrolled120ConditionsOverweight and Obesity, Nutrition Poor, Diet ModificationArmsCSA Group, Enhanced Usual Care Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Produce Prescription Dose Response: A Randomized Community Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Benefits of Nutrition Education in Local Community Supported Agriculture Sites: A Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seth A BerkowitzDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: seth_berkowitz@med.unc.edu.
Jessica O'NeillJust Roots, Greenfield, Massachusetts.
Edward SayerCommunity Health Center of Franklin County, Greenfield, Massachusetts.
Naysha N ShahidDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maegan PetrieCommunity Health Center of Franklin County, Greenfield, Massachusetts.
Sophie SchouboeJust Roots, Greenfield, Massachusetts; TerraCorps, Lowell, Massachusetts.
Megan SaracenoJust Roots, Greenfield, Massachusetts; TerraCorps, Lowell, Massachusetts.
Rochelle BellinJust Roots, Greenfield, Massachusetts.

Funding

Understanding & Overcoming Food Insecurity in Diabetes PatientsK23DK109200 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BERKOWITZ, SETH A · 2016 to 2020
$973k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK109200NIDDK NIH HHS L30 DK103291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocioeconomically vulnerable individuals often face poor access to nutritious food and bear a disproportionate burden of diet-related chronic illness. This study tested whether a subsidized community-supported agriculture intervention could improve diet quality. STUDY

designAn RCT was conducted from May 2017 to December 2018 (data analyzed in 2019). SETTING/

participantsAdults with a BMI >25 kg/m

interventionIndividuals were randomized to receive either subsidized community-supported agriculture membership (which provided a weekly farm produce pickup from June to November) or healthy eating information (control group). For equity, the control group received financial incentives similar to the intervention group.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the Healthy Eating Index 2010 total score (range, 0-100; higher indicates better diet quality; minimum clinically meaningful difference, 3). Healthy Eating Index was assessed using 3 24-hour recalls per participant collected each growing season. Intention-to-treat analyses compared Healthy Eating Index scores between the intervention and control group, accounting for repeated measures with generalized estimating equations.

resultsThere were 128 participants enrolled and 122 participants for analysis. The participants' mean age was 50.3 (SD=13.6) years; 82% were women; and 88% were white, non-Hispanic, with a similar distribution of baseline characteristics comparing the intervention and control groups. Baseline Healthy Eating Index total score was 53.9 (SD=15.3) in the control group and 55.1 (SD=15.2) in the intervention group (p=0.68). The intervention increased the mean Healthy Eating Index total score relative to the control group (4.3 points higher, 95% CI=0.5, 8.1, p=0.03). Food insecurity was lower in the intervention group (RR=0.68, 95% CI=0.48, 0.96).

conclusionsA community-supported agriculture intervention resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in diet quality. Subsidized community-supported agriculture may be an important intervention for vulnerable individuals.

trial registrationThis study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03231592. SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION: This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Indexed as

AgricultureCommunity Health CentersDiet, HealthyHealth PromotionBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID31522922
PMCPMC6874748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.