ArticleSurgery2019
Whole blood thrombin generation is distinct from plasma thrombin generation in healthy volunteers and after severe injury.
Article in Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accurate Thrombin Monitoring Based on Proximity Ligation Assay-Assisted Rolling Circle Amplification (RCA).Molecular biotechnology · 2024Article
- Astrocytes and pericytes attenuate severely injured patient plasma mediated expression of tight junction proteins in endothelial cells.PloS one · 2022Article
- Whole Blood Thrombin Generation in Severely Injured Patients Requiring Massive Transfusion.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2021Article
- Trauma-induced coagulopathy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021Review
- Exploring the utility of a novel point-of-care whole blood thrombin generation assay following trauma: A pilot study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlasma thrombin generation has been used to characterize trauma-induced coagulopathy, but description of whole blood thrombin generation is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate plasma and whole blood thrombin generation in healthy volunteers and trauma patients. We hypothesized that (1) plasma and whole blood thrombin generation are distinct, (2) whole blood thrombin generation is more pronounced in trauma patients than in healthy volunteers, and (3) thrombin generation correlates with clinical coagulation assays.
methodsBlood was collected from healthy volunteers and trauma patients at a single, level-1 trauma center. Whole blood thrombin generation was assessed with a prototype point-of-care whole blood thrombin generation device, and plasma thrombin generation was measured with a calibrated automated thrombogram analogue. Plasma and whole blood thrombin generation were compared and correlated with international normalized ratio and thrombelastography.
resultsOverall, 10 healthy volunteers (average age 30, 50% men) were included and 58 trauma patients (average age 34, 76% men, 55% blunt mechanism, and with a median new injury severity score of 17) were included. Plasma and whole blood thrombin generation differed with more robust thrombin generation in plasma. Trauma patients had a significantly increased whole blood thrombin generation compared with healthy volunteers]. Plasma thrombin generation correlated with international normalized ratio, whereas whole blood thrombin generation did not correlate with thrombelastography.
conclusionPlasma and whole blood thrombin generation are distinct, highlighting the need to perform standardized assays to better understand their correlation and to assess how whole blood thrombin generation confers differential outcomes in trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.