Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31522691›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Pooling as a strategy for the timely diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths in stool: value and reproducibility.

Marina Papaiakovou, James Wright, Nils Pilotte, Darren Chooneea, Fabian Schär, James E Truscott, Julia C Dunn, Iain Gardiner, Judd L Walson, Steven A Williams and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anthelmintic drugs for treating ascariasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Occurrence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Direct detection of Strongyloides infection via molecular and antigen detection methods.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Diagnostic Techniques for Soil-Transmitted Helminths - Recent Advances.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marina PapaiakovouDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK. m.papaiakovou@nhm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9012-2703
James WrightDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nils PilotteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, MA, USA.
Darren ChooneeaCore Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
Fabian SchärDeWorm3, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
James E TruscottDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Julia C DunnDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Iain GardinerDeWorm3, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
Judd L WalsonDeWorm3, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
Steven A WilliamsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, MA, USA.
D Timothy J LittlewoodDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
Natural History Museum · GBImperial College London · GBSmith College · USHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1129535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe strategy of pooling stool specimens has been extensively used in the field of parasitology in order to facilitate the screening of large numbers of samples whilst minimizing the prohibitive cost of single sample analysis. The aim of this study was to develop a standardized reproducible pooling protocol for stool samples, validated between two different laboratories, without jeopardizing the sensitivity of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays employed for the detection of soil-transmitted helminths (STHs). Two distinct experimental phases were recruited. First, the sensitivity and specificity of the established protocol was assessed by real-time PCR for each one of the STHs. Secondly, agreement and reproducibility of the protocol between the two different laboratories were tested. The need for multiple stool sampling to avoid false negative results was also assessed. Finally, a cost exercise was conducted which included labour cost in low- and high-wage settings, consumable cost, prevalence of a single STH species, and a simple distribution pattern of the positive samples in pools to estimate time and money savings suggested by the strategy.

resultsThe sensitivity of the pooling method was variable among the STH species but consistent between the two laboratories. Estimates of specificity indicate a 'pooling approach' can yield a low frequency of 'missed' infections. There were no significant differences regarding the execution of the protocol and the subsequent STH detection between the two laboratories, which suggests in most cases the protocol is reproducible by adequately trained staff. Finally, given the high degree of agreement, there appears to be little or no need for multiple sampling of either individuals or pools.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the pooling protocol developed herein is a robust and efficient strategy for the detection of STHs in 'pools-of-five'. There is notable complexity of the pool preparation to ensure even distribution of helminth DNA throughout. Therefore, at a given setting, cost of labour among other logistical and epidemiological factors, is the more concerning and determining factor when choosing pooling strategies, rather than losing sensitivity and/or specificity of the molecular assay or the method.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFecesHelminthiasisHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingBreakpoint of transmissionCost analysis of poolingPoolingqPCR-based diagnosticsSoil-transmitted helminthsStool samples

Identifiers

PMID31522691
PMCPMC6745781
OpenAlexW2972825413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.