ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2019
Interobserver reliability of ICSD-3 diagnostic criteria for disorders of arousal in adults.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis and Management of NREM Sleep Parasomnias in Children and Adults.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Systematic Review of Sleep-Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies.Biomedicines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDisorders of arousal include confusional arousals, sleepwalking and sleep terrors. The diagnosis of disorders of arousal is based on the clinical criteria established in the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, third edition, although the interobserver reliability of these criteria has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to estimate the inter-rater reliability of the diagnostic criteria for disorders of arousal throughout the whole life in order to understand their feasibility in clinical daily activity and in multicenter observational studies.
methodsThree raters interviewed 126 subjects (patients complaining of sleep disorders, headache, and healthy subjects), aged 18-80 years, with a standardized questionnaire created by applying the International Diagnostic Criteria for Disorders of Arousal.
resultsAn "almost perfect" inter-rater reliability for disorders of arousal criteria and the final diagnosis was found among the raters (kappa 0.89 for confusional arousals, 0.87 for sleepwalking, and 0.87 for sleep terrors).
conclusionsThe International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition criteria are adequate for a reliable diagnosis of disorders of arousal. Further validation studies, confirming DOA diagnosis with video polysomnography, are needed to investigate the predictive value of ICSD-3 criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.