Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31522376›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Acceptance of Self-Sampling Among Long-Term Cervical Screening Non-Attenders with HPV-Positive Results: Promising Opportunity for Specific Cancer Education.

Sonia Andersson, Karen Belkić, Miriam Mints, Ellinor Östensson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02750124 (IT-system Development for Individualization of Cervix Cancer Screening and Implementation of New Strategies to Reach Non-attenders), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02750124 naunknown statusnot on this map

IT-system Development for Individualization of Cervix Cancer Screening and Implementation of New Strategies to Reach Non-attenders

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2016 to 2021Enrolled8,000ConditionsHuman Papillomavirus DNA Tests, Cervical CancerArmsCobas PCR Female swab sample Packet, Routine practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A New Brazilian Device for Cervical Cancer Screening: Acceptability and Accuracy of Self-sampling.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonia AnderssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska University Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karen BelkićDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Karen.Belkic@ki.se.
Miriam MintsDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska University Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ellinor ÖstenssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska University Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate acceptance of vaginal self-sampling for high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) among long-term screening non-attenders at increased cervical cancer risk and to identify leverage points to promote screening adherence among these women. Forty-three long-term screening non-attenders performed home vaginal self-sampling for HPV, had positive HPV results, and subsequently attended gynecologic examination. Sixteen (37.2%) had high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2 or 3), and two had invasive cervical cancer. Forty-one of these women completed a questionnaire concerning Specific Knowledge about HPV, CIN, and cervical cancer, potential barriers to screening and views about self-sampling. Results were compared with 479 women treated for CIN2+ who attended gynecologic follow-up and also performed self-sampling. Significant multivariate predictors of long-term non-attender status compared with referents were low Specific Knowledge, high confidence in self-sampling, and potential barriers-refraining from activity to attend gynecologic examination, needing another's help to attend, and long travel time. Non-attenders citing fear/refraining from gynecologic examination as why they preferred self-sampling significantly more often had lowest Specific Knowledge compared with other non-attenders. All non-attenders could envision themselves doing self-sampling again while only 74% of referents endorsed this statement (p = 0.0003). We conclude that HPV self-sampling is an acceptable option for women at increased cervical cancer risk who have been long-term screening non-attenders. Educational outreach to enhance Specific Knowledge about HPV, CIN and cervical cancer is critical. Those non-attenders who explicitly avoid gynecologic examinations need special attention. Trial Registry: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02750124.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPapillomaviridaeSpecimen HandlingVaginal SmearsCervical cancer screeningHPV testingLeverage pointsSelfcollectionSpecific knowledge

Identifiers

PMID31522376
PMCPMC7835166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.