Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31522345›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020

Automated vertebrae localization and identification by decision forests and image-based refinement on real-world CT data.

Ana Jimenez-Pastor, Angel Alberich-Bayarri, Belen Fos-Guarinos, Fabio Garcia-Castro, David Garcia-Juan, Ben Glocker, Luis Marti-Bonmati

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision in Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Lumbar spine segmentation method based on deep learning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Artificial intelligence and spine imaging: limitations, regulatory issues and future direction.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Review
  11. Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Jimenez-PastorQUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain. anajimenez@quibim.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-9429
Angel Alberich-BayarriQUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain.
Belen Fos-GuarinosQUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain.
Fabio Garcia-CastroQUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain.
David Garcia-JuanQUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain.
Ben GlockerComputing Department, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Luis Marti-BonmatiQUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness DPI2014-53401-C2-2-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDevelopment of a fully automatic algorithm for the automatic localization and identification of vertebral bodies in computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis algorithm was developed using a dataset based on real-world data of 232 thoraco-abdominopelvic CT scans retrospectively collected. In order to achieve an accurate solution, a two-stage automated method was developed: decision forests for a rough prediction of vertebral bodies position, and morphological image processing techniques to refine the previous detection by locating the position of the spinal canal.

resultsThe mean distance error between the predicted vertebrae centroid position and truth was 13.7 mm. The identification rate was 79.6% on the thoracic region and of 74.8% on the lumbar segment.

conclusionThe algorithm provides a new method to detect and identify vertebral bodies from arbitrary field-of-view body CT scans.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecision TreesMachine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnatomic LandmarksDatasets as TopicHumansMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesSpineYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyDecision forestSpine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.