Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31522321›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2019

Differences in reported sun protection practices, skin cancer knowledge, and perceived risk for skin cancer between rural and urban high school students.

Elizabeth S Nagelhout, Bridget G Parsons, Benjamin Haaland, Kenneth P Tercyak, Kelsey Zaugg, Angela Zhu, Garrett Harding, Jeffrey Yancey, Jakob D Jensen, Douglas Grossman and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Application of the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) in Teaching Skin Cancer Prevention Behaviors in Male Students.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rural-Urban Differences in Sun Exposure and Protection Behaviors in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Incidental sun exposures as a source of sunburn among rural compared to urban residents in the United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Adolescents' Perceptions About Cancer and Preferences for Cancer Education.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elizabeth S NagelhoutDivision of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, 375 Chipeta Way, Suite A, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Bridget G ParsonsHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Benjamin HaalandHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Kenneth P TercyakCancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Kelsey ZauggHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Angela ZhuHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Garrett HardingHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Jeffrey YanceyHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Jakob D JensenDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Dr #2400, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Douglas GrossmanHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
David W WetterHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Yelena P WuHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. Yelena.Wu@utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1571-6154

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CORNELIA M ULRICH · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE-UL1: BPCAUL1RR025764 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2008 to 2011
$19.4M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
Communal Feedback as an Innovative Alternative to Skin Self-ExamDP2EB022360 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JENSEN, JAKOB DANIEL · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
Translational Approaches to Melanoma Prevention in Children at High Genetic RiskK07CA196985 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WU, YELENA PING · 2015 to 2019
$682k
CDC HHS 1NU58DP006321NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000105NCI NIH HHS K07 CA196985NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCI NIH HHS P30CA042014NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30CA051008NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025764NIBIB NIH HHS DP2 EB022360NIH HHS 1DP2EB022360-01NIH HHS 3P30CA042014-29S7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the current study was to evaluate differences in reported use of sun protection, tanning behaviors, skin cancer-related knowledge, and perceived risk between rural and urban high school students in a geographic area with high rates of melanoma.

methodsA total of 1,570 high school students (56.8% female) from urban (6 schools) and rural (7 schools) geographic areas in Utah completed questionnaires assessing sun protection and tanning behaviors, skin cancer-related knowledge, and perceived risk for skin cancer. Analyses examined potential differences in these outcomes between rural and urban students and by gender.

resultsCompared to students in urban areas, those in rural areas had lower odds of wearing sunscreen (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53, 0.95; p = 0.022), re-applying sunscreen (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.74, 1.02; p = 0.002), wearing long-sleeved shirts (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.46, 0.86; p = 0.004), and seeking shade (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.50, 0.88; p = 0.005).

conclusionsRural students reported less adequate use of sun protection than urban students. Rural male students reported lower knowledge scores compared to urban males. Future skin cancer prevention efforts targeting rural high schoolers are warranted.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRural PopulationUrban PopulationAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleRiskSchoolsSkin NeoplasmsStudentsSunbathingSunscreening AgentsSurveys and QuestionnairesSunscreening AgentsCancer preventionHealth educationRural healthSkin cancer

Identifiers

PMID31522321
PMCPMC6802938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.