Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31522316›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2019

Homeostasis Model Assessment cut-off points related to metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Paola Arellano-Ruiz, Antonio García-Hermoso, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Diana Pozuelo-Carrascosa, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Monserrat Solera-Martinez

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Paola Arellano-RuizCentro de estudios Socio-Sanitarios, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Antonio García-HermosoNavarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), IdiSNA, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), Pamplona, Navarra, Spain. antonio.garciah@unavarra.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1397-7182
Iván Cavero-RedondoCentro de estudios Socio-Sanitarios, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Diana Pozuelo-CarrascosaCentro de estudios Socio-Sanitarios, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Vicente Martínez-VizcaínoCentro de estudios Socio-Sanitarios, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Monserrat Solera-MartinezCentro de estudios Socio-Sanitarios, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
University of Castilla-La Mancha · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Chile · CLUniversidad de Santiago de Chile · CLUniversidad Politécnica y Artística del Paraguay · PY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of cut-off points of Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA-IR) to determine metabolic syndrome (MetS) in children and adolescents. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, Proquest, and Scopus databases from their inception to June 2018. Random effects models for the diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) value computed by Moses' constant for a linear model and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the accuracy of the test. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves (HSROC) were used to summarize the overall test performance. Six published studies were included in the meta-analysis that included 8732 children and adolescents. The region of HOMA-IR (i.e., dOR) associated with MetS range from 2.30 to 3.54. The pooled accuracy parameters from the studies that evaluated the diagnostic odds ratio of HOMA-IR ranged from 4.39 to 37.67.Conclusion: the HOMA-IR test may be useful for early evaluating children and adolescents with insulin resistance (IR). Furthermore, they present a good diagnostic accuracy independently of the definition of MetS used. According to the studies, the HOMA-IR cut point to avoid MetS risk ranged from 2.30 to 3.59.What is Known:• There is no consensus to define the optimal cut-off point of Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance in children and adolescents associated with Metabolic Syndrome.What is New:• The Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance test may be useful for early evaluations in children and adolescents with insulin resistance and presents a good diagnostic accuracy independently of the definition of Metabolic Syndrome used.• The Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance cut point to avoid Metabolic Syndrome risk ranged from 2.30 to 3.59.

Indexed as

HomeostasisAdolescentChildHumansMetabolic SyndromeCardiometabolic riskHOMA-IRInsulin resistanceYouth

Identifiers

PMID31522316
OpenAlexW2972538849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.