Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31522288›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2020

Diagnosis of myocardial infarction at autopsy: AECVP reappraisal in the light of the current clinical classification.

Katarzyna Michaud, Cristina Basso, Giulia d'Amati, Carla Giordano, Ivana Kholová, Stephen D Preston, Stefania Rizzo, Sara Sabatasso, Mary N Sheppard, Aryan Vink and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cardiac-specific troponin-I (cTnI) in a post-mortem setting.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Katarzyna MichaudUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne - Geneva, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Chemin de la Vulliette 4, CH - 1000, Lausanne 25, Switzerland. katarzyna.michaud@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-2544
Cristina BassoCardiovascular Pathology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giulia d'AmatiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Carla GiordanoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ivana KholováPathology, Fimlab Laboratories and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4089-0450
Stephen D PrestonRoyal Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CB23 3RE, UK.
Stefania RizzoCardiovascular Pathology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sara SabatassoUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Geneva University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mary N SheppardDepartment of Cardiovascular Pathology, Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's Medical School, London, UK.
Aryan VinkUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Allard C van der WalAmsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.c.vanderwal@amc.uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5590-3758
Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology (AECVP)
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Padua · ITAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLPapworth Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBTampere University · FIUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and death worldwide. Consequently, myocardial infarctions are often encountered in clinical and forensic autopsies, and diagnosis can be challenging, especially in the absence of an acute coronary occlusion. Precise histopathological identification and timing of myocardial infarction in humans often remains uncertain while it can be of crucial importance, especially in a forensic setting when third person involvement or medical responsibilities are in question. A proper post-mortem diagnosis requires not only up-to-date knowledge of the ischemic coronary and myocardial pathology, but also a correct interpretation of such findings in relation to the clinical scenario of the deceased. For these reasons, it is important for pathologists to be familiar with the different clinically defined types of myocardial infarction and to discriminate myocardial infarction from other forms of myocardial injury. This article reviews present knowledge and post-mortem diagnostic methods, including post-mortem imaging, to reveal the different types of myocardial injury and the clinical-pathological correlations with currently defined types of myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

AutopsyDeath, Sudden, CardiacForensic PathologyHumansMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumPathology, ClinicalAcute coronary syndromesAutopsyImmunohistochemistryMyocardial infarctionMyocardial injuryPost-mortem imaging

Identifiers

PMID31522288
PMCPMC7028821
OpenAlexW2972785413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.