Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31522272›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Daniela A Ferraro, Urs J Muehlematter, Helena I Garcia Schüler, Niels J Rupp, Martin Huellner, Michael Messerli, Jan Hendrik Rüschoff, Edwin E G W Ter Voert, Thomas Hermanns, Irene A Burger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Head-to-Head Comparison ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development and external validation of a multivariable [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The efficacy ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  17. The prognostic value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela A FerraroDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Urs J MuehlematterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Helena I Garcia SchülerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Niels J RuppDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin HuellnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Michael MesserliDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jan Hendrik RüschoffDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Edwin E G W Ter VoertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Thomas HermannsDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Irene A BurgerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland. Irene.Burger@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8029-8692
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is a curative treatment option for patients with clinically significant localised prostate cancer. The decision to perform an ePLND can be challenging because the overall incidence of lymph node metastasis is relatively low and ePLND is not free of complications. Using current clinical nomograms to identify patients with nodal involvement, approximately 75-85% of ePLNDs performed are negative. The aim of this study was to assess the added value of

methods

resultsOverall, pathology of ePLND specimens revealed 31 pelvic metastatic lymph nodes in 12 patients.

conclusionOur model combining PSA, Gleason score and visual lymph node analysis on

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionProstatic NeoplasmsEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansLymph NodesMaleNeoplasm StagingOligopeptidesPatient SelectionProstatectomyEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesLymph node metastasesNet benefitNomogramPET/CTPET/MRPET quantificationPrediction modelStagingSUVmax

Identifiers

PMID31522272
OpenAlexW2973010805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.