Observational studyHeart and vessels2020
Association between plasma concentration of edoxaban determined by direct and indirect methods in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (CVI ARO 7).
Observational study in Heart and vessels, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Age, BMI and Creatinine Clearance on Edoxaban Plasma Concentrations in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Changes in plasma concentrations of edoxaban and coagulation biomarkers according to thromboembolic risk and atrial fibrillation type in patients undergoing catheter ablation: Subanalysis of KYU-RABLE.Journal of arrhythmia · 2021Article
- Factors Associated With Edoxaban Concentration Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Exploratory Analysis of Circulating miRNA Signatures in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Determining Potential Biomarkers to Support Decision-Making in Anticoagulation and Catheter Ablation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants, including edoxaban, primarily do not need routine monitoring of the anticoagulant effect. However, extremely high/low plasma concentrations of edoxaban (PC-Ed) should be properly evaluated, especially when patients under anticoagulation therapy are at an emergency state. For this purpose, PC-Ed determined by an anti-Xa assay (indirect PC-Ed) is more convenient and, therefore, more useful compared with PC-Ed determined by an LC-MS/MS (direct PC-Ed) in daily clinical practice. Consecutive 97 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) under edoxaban therapy were evaluated, in whom edoxaban 60/30 mg doses were prescribed for 48/49 patients, 71 (73.2%) were men, and the average age was 69 years. CHADS
Indexed as
Identifiers
31522245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.