Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31521911›Full record

ArticleInfant behavior & development2019

Social touch alters newborn monkey behavior.

Elizabeth A Simpson, Sarah E Maylott, Roberto J Lazo, Kyla A Leonard, Stefano S K Kaburu, Stephen J Suomi, Annika Paukner, Pier F Ferrari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infant behavior & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Elizabeth A SimpsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA. Electronic address: simpsone@miami.edu.
Sarah E MaylottDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Roberto J LazoDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Kyla A LeonardDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA; Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA.
Stefano S K KaburuDepartment of Biomedical Science & Physiology, Faculty of Science & Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, England, United Kingdom.
Stephen J SuomiEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Poolesville, Maryland, USA.
Annika PauknerDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom.
Pier F FerrariInstitut des Sciences Cognitives 'Marc Jeannerod', CNRS, and Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France.
University of Miami · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USInstitut des Sciences Cognitives · FRNottingham Trent University · GBUniversity of Wolverhampton · GB

Funding

Project IV: Investigating the Mirror Neuron System in austism spectrum disorderP01HD064653 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FOX, NATHAN A, WOODWARD, AMANDA L · 2010 to 2020
$11.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD064653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, infants respond positively to slow, gentle stroking-processed by C-tactile (CT) nerve fibers-by showing reductions in stress and increases in eye contact, smiling, and positive vocalizations. More frequent maternal touch is linked to greater activity and connectivity strength in social brain regions, and increases children's attention to and learning of faces. It has been theorized that touch may prime children for social interactions and set them on a path towards healthy social cognitive development. However, less is known about the effects of touch on young infants' psychological development, especially in the newborn period, a highly sensitive period of transition with rapid growth in sensory and social processing. It remains untested whether newborns can distinguish CT-targeted touch from other types of touch, or whether there are benefits of touch for newborns' social, emotional, or cognitive development. In the present study, we experimentally investigated the acute effects of touch in newborn monkeys, a common model for human social development. Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), like humans, are highly social, have complex mother-infant interactions with frequent body contact for the first weeks of life, making them an excellent model of infant sociality. Infant monkeys in the present study were reared in a neonatal nursery, enabling control over their early environment, including all caregiver interactions. One-week-old macaque infants (N = 27) participated in three 5-minute counter-balanced caregiver interactions, all with mutual gaze: stroking head and shoulders (CT-targeted touch), stroking palms of hands and soles of feet (Non-CT touch), or no stroking (No-touch). Immediately following the interaction, infants watched social and nonsocial videos and picture arrays including faces and objects, while we tracked their visual attention with remote eye tracking. We found that, during the caregiver interactions, infants behaved differently while being touched compared to the no-touch condition, irrespective of the body part touched. Most notably, in both touch conditions, infants exhibited fewer stress-related behaviors-self-scratching, locomotion, and contact time with a comfort object-compared to when they were not touched. Following CT-targeted touch, infants were faster to orient to the picture arrays compared to the other interaction conditions, suggesting CT-targeted touch may activate or prime infants' attentional orienting system. In the No-touch condition infants attended longer to the nonsocial compared to the social video, possibly reflecting a baseline preference for nonsocial stimuli. In contrast, in both touch conditions, infants' looked equally to the social and nonsocial videos, suggesting that touch may influence the types of visual stimuli that hold infants' attention. Collectively, our results reveal that newborn macaques responded positively to touch, and touch appeared to influence some aspects of their subsequent attention, although we found limited evidence that these effects are mediated by CT fibers. These findings suggest that newborn touch may broadly support infants' psychological development, and may have early evolutionary roots, shared across primates. This study illustrates the unique insight offered by nonhuman primates for exploring early infant social touch, revealing that touch may positively affect emotional and attentional development as early as the newborn period.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAttentionCognitionEmotionsFemaleLearningMacaca mulattaMaleOrientationPhotic StimulationTouch PerceptionCT fibersFace perceptionInfant behaviorNeonateSociabilitySocial attentionTactile

Identifiers

PMID31521911
PMCPMC6878204
OpenAlexW2973102748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.