Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31521404›Full record

ArticleTrends in genetics : TIG2019

Paircounting.

Huy Q Nguyen, S Dean Lee, C-Ting Wu

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huy Q NguyenDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
S Dean LeeDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
C-Ting WuDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: twu@genetics.med.harvard.edu.

Funding

Center for Genomically Engineered OrgansRM1HG008525 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI CHURCH, GEORGE M · 2015 to 2019
$10.2M
Culling the human genome of disease variants using ultraconserved elementsR01HD091797 · NICHD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WU, CHAO-TING · 2016 to 2020
$5.5M
Technologies for visualizing the genome in situR01GM123289 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WU, CHAO-TING · 2017 to 2020
$2.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG008525NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091797NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X inactivation presents two longstanding puzzles: the counting and choice of X chromosomes. Here, we consider counting and choice in the context of pairing, both of the X and of the autosomes.

Indexed as

Chromosome PairingChromosomesX ChromosomeX Chromosome InactivationAnimalsHumansMammalsMiceModels, GeneticchoicecountingpairingX, autosomesX inactivation

Identifiers

PMID31521404
PMCPMC7176042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.