ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2019
Distant supervision for treatment relation extraction by leveraging MeSH subheadings.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- LitTx: A New Treatment Relation Extraction Dataset.LREC ... International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation · 2026Article
- Machine learning in healthcare citizen science: A scoping review.International journal of medical informatics · 2025Article
- MeSH2Matrix: combining MeSH keywords and machine learning for biomedical relation classification based on PubMed.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- Emerging technologies in adipose tissue research.Adipocyte · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The growing body of knowledge in biomedicine is too vast for human consumption. Hence there is a need for automated systems able to navigate and distill the emerging wealth of information. One fundamental task to that end is relation extraction, whereby linguistic expressions of semantic relationships between biomedical entities are recognized and extracted. In this study, we propose a novel distant supervision approach for relation extraction of binary treatment relationships such that high quality positive/negative training examples are generated from PubMed abstracts by leveraging associated MeSH subheadings. The quality of generated examples is assessed based on the quality of supervised models they induce; that is, the mean performance of trained models (derived via bootstrapped ensembling) on a gold standard test set is used as a proxy for data quality. We show that our approach is preferable to traditional distant supervision for treatment relations and is closer to human crowd annotations in terms of annotation quality. For treatment relations, our generated training data performs at 81.38%, compared to traditional distant supervision at 64.33% and crowd-sourced annotations at 90.57% on the model-wide PR-AUC metric. We also demonstrate that examples generated using our method can be used to augment crowd-sourced datasets. Augmented models improve over non-augmented models by more than two absolute points on the more established F1 metric. We lastly demonstrate that performance can be further improved by implementing a classification loss that is resistant to label noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.