Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31521249›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2019

Distant supervision for treatment relation extraction by leveraging MeSH subheadings.

Tung Tran, Ramakanth Kavuluru

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. LitTx: A New Treatment Relation Extraction Dataset.LREC ... International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation · 2026
    Article
  2. Machine learning in healthcare citizen science: A scoping review.International journal of medical informatics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tung TranDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States. Electronic address: tung.tran@uky.edu.
Ramakanth KavuluruDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States. Electronic address: ramakanth.kavuluru@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
From Syntactic Relations to Semantic Predications: Porting Open Information Extraction to BiomedicineR21LM012274 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KAVULURU, VENKATA NAGA RAMAKANTH · 2016 to 2017
$374k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NLM NIH HHS R21 LM012274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing body of knowledge in biomedicine is too vast for human consumption. Hence there is a need for automated systems able to navigate and distill the emerging wealth of information. One fundamental task to that end is relation extraction, whereby linguistic expressions of semantic relationships between biomedical entities are recognized and extracted. In this study, we propose a novel distant supervision approach for relation extraction of binary treatment relationships such that high quality positive/negative training examples are generated from PubMed abstracts by leveraging associated MeSH subheadings. The quality of generated examples is assessed based on the quality of supervised models they induce; that is, the mean performance of trained models (derived via bootstrapped ensembling) on a gold standard test set is used as a proxy for data quality. We show that our approach is preferable to traditional distant supervision for treatment relations and is closer to human crowd annotations in terms of annotation quality. For treatment relations, our generated training data performs at 81.38%, compared to traditional distant supervision at 64.33% and crowd-sourced annotations at 90.57% on the model-wide PR-AUC metric. We also demonstrate that examples generated using our method can be used to augment crowd-sourced datasets. Augmented models improve over non-augmented models by more than two absolute points on the more established F1 metric. We lastly demonstrate that performance can be further improved by implementing a classification loss that is resistant to label noise.

Indexed as

Data MiningMedical Subject HeadingsPubMedSupervised Machine LearningAbstracting and IndexingArea Under CurveCrowdsourcingHumansSemanticsDistant supervisionMedical treatment relationMeSH subheadingsRelation extraction

Identifiers

PMID31521249
PMCPMC6748648
OpenAlexW2953834914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.